Teams

WCCP-Willman

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 MEN

7 players · average NTRP / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-11-05vs YTC-FergusonWon 21
W#1 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Eric Rasmussen / John Fernandez3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Vancott / Michael Moloney vs Dan Ferguson / Steve Howard6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve Lamberson / Jeffrey Gillespie vs John Asriel / Robert Darby1-6, 3-6
2022-11-04vs EW-PC-MarshallLost 03
L#1 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Emmitt Jackson / Roman Gavino3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Gillespie / Bruce Johnson vs Vincent Beasley / John Hilmes5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Vancott / Michael Moloney vs Bart Munson / John Almond5-7, 3-6
2022-11-04vs WRAC-NoydLost 12
W#1 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Michael Bendtsen / Bryan Noyd6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Vancott / Michael Moloney vs Kevin Kromholtz / Matthew Connelly7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Lamberson / Mark Switzer vs Stephen Knox / Larry Woodward3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
John Omlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Ray Willman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Steve Lamberson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Robert Vancott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jeffrey Gillespie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Switzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Moloney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Vancott + Jeffrey Gillespie4850% games+9.0% vs expected
John Omlin + Ray Willman413752% games+2.4% vs expected
Robert Vancott + Ray Willman2742% games−9.3% vs expected
Steve Lamberson + Jeffrey Gillespie1737% gamesnot enough data
Robert Vancott + Michael Moloney2540% gamesnot enough data
Michael Moloney + Jeffrey Gillespie0531% gamesnot enough data
Steve Lamberson + Mark Switzer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Omlin
51W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Ray Willman
37W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
Steve Lamberson
21W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Robert Vancott
36W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.95
Jeffrey Gillespie
12W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Switzer
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Michael Moloney
10W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.