Teams

Tod.Blevins55A

2024 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-25vs Jo.Parham55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesJohn Cleary / Charles Ashby vs John van Campen / Ken Dehaven0-6, 2-6
2024-04-16vs Ra.Louzao55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesChristopher Carrigan / Charles Ashby vs Mike Cockrill / Jairo Pacheco2-6, 2-6
2024-04-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Caulfield / Ben Micham vs David Shuman / William Smith6-0, 6-1
2024-03-19vs Jo.Cockerham55AWon 20
W#2 DoublesBen Micham / Michael Campbell vs Philip Robertson / Alan Hicks6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJon Proulx / Charles Ashby vs Ken Haney / Rick Smith4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-12vs Da.Huffman55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesCharles Ashby / John Cleary vs Greg Byrd / Allen McMillen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-05vs Da.Swann55AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarty Kocurek / Ben Micham vs Charles Brignac / Gary Sollenberger6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Robert Caulfield
published
3.27
Todd Blevins
published
3.26
Bill Green
published 3.5
3.17
Michael Campbell
published
3.16
Mark Zimmerman
published
3.12
Ben Micham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
John Cleary
published
3.02
2.97
Charles Ashby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Jon Proulx
published
Marty Kocurek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Blevins + Bill Green224 matchesnot enough data
Mark Zimmerman + Bill Green303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Caulfield
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.34
Todd Blevins
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bill Green
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
Michael Campbell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Mark Zimmerman
8W–16L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Ben Micham
72W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
John Cleary
2W–16L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Christopher Carrigan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Charles Ashby
19W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
Jon Proulx
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.94
Marty Kocurek
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.