Teams

PTCTC - Armada/Scheinhost

2025 SCTA Winter '24 · '25 - USTA Adult 40 & Over Women

22 players · average NTRP 3.83 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-26vs Summergrove - Clarke/GalushaLost 01
L#3 DoublesJo-Ann Jones / Daniella Lambright vs Tammy Porch / Jill Mitchell3-6, 2-6
2025-02-06Won 10
W#4 DoublesKimberly Funte / Daniella Lambright vs Meiling Familo / Jennifer Staples6-1, 6-2
2025-01-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesLinzi Adkins / Meghan Kearney vs Tammy Porch / Kimmie Wise7-6, 2-6, 7-6
2025-01-16vs PTCTC - Stoots/SimpsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeghan Kearney / Linzi Adkins vs Micki Harris / Stacy Killmon7-6, 6-4
2025-01-09vs Summergrove - Clarke/GalushaLost 02
L#1 DoublesMindy Leech / Kristy Littleton vs Kimmie Wise / Mary Knight3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDaniella Lambright / Leslie Spitznagle vs Tammy Porch / Joy Cliche1-6, 1-6
2024-12-05vs PTCTC - Stoots/SimpsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJo-Ann Jones / Daniella Lambright vs Erin Stoots / Cathy Hussard-Parnell2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for '25 - USTA Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Meghan Kearney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Jennifer Kapala Oldham
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.88
Marcie Stoniecki
published
3.85
Lauren Costick
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.83
Chanda Kearns
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.80
Adriana Marshburn
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Barbara Lee
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.74
Jo-Ann Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Erin Armada
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
3.72
Lauren Terranova
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
3.72
Cassi Weissflog
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Gretchen Scheinost
published
3.64
Kimberly Funte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Shannon Rose
published
3.58
Leslie Spitznagle
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.44
Jennifer Beseau
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.40
Kristy Littleton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Abby Gates
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.21
Dina Slater
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Daniella Lambright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Linzi Adkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mindy Leech
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cassi Weissflog + Barbara Lee5168% games+15.5% vs expected
Erin Armada + Abby Gates5258% games+9.2% vs expected
Meghan Kearney + Cassi Weissflog7162% games+5.4% vs expected
Jo-Ann Jones + Erin Armada4158% games+2.9% vs expected
Barbara Lee + Gretchen Scheinost8359% games+1.6% vs expected
Leslie Spitznagle + Chanda Kearns6451% games+0.1% vs expected
Cassi Weissflog + Adriana Marshburn3255% games−0.9% vs expected
Cassi Weissflog + Jennifer Kapala Oldham6257% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meghan Kearney
48W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Jennifer Kapala Oldham
47W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Marcie Stoniecki
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Lauren Costick
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Chanda Kearns
9W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Adriana Marshburn
65W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Barbara Lee
57W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Jo-Ann Jones
27W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Erin Armada
28W–22L career · 9 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Lauren Terranova
24W–13L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
4
Cassi Weissflog
33W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Gretchen Scheinost
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Kimberly Funte
59W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.64
Shannon Rose
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Leslie Spitznagle
10W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.58
Jennifer Beseau
34W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Kristy Littleton
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Abby Gates
16W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Dina Slater
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Daniella Lambright
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Linzi Adkins
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mindy Leech
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.