Teams

MAC-Aguilar

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.14 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Quintin Yray
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.93
Rodrigo Aguilar
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.85
John Helmer III
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
James Hockley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Brian Posewitz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
William Hergenhan
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.63
James Ringelberg
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Results8 ties
2018-11-17Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBill Jackson / John Helmer III vs Glenn Woodworth / Richard Hammerquist6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesQuintin Yray / Kit Johnson vs Chris Grenzer / Mitchell Strauss6-0, 6-3
2018-11-16Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJohn Helmer III / Brian Posewitz vs Paul Wulf / Leonard Wofford6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesQuintin Yray / Kit Johnson vs Brian Leahy / Glenn Gerstmar6-1, 6-0
2018-10-21Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Posewitz / Jack Henry vs Mitchell Strauss / Mike McNairy6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJames Hockley / Quintin Yray vs David Kabaker / Richard Hammerquist6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRodrigo Aguilar / William Hergenhan vs Charlie Dolezal / Stuart Allen6-0
2018-10-20Split 11
W#1 DoublesRodrigo Aguilar / Quintin Yray vs Mike Farrell / Mike Reiss7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Hergenhan / James Ringelberg vs Brian Joelson / Bill Rhoades6-4, 6-0
2018-10-13Won 21
L#1 DoublesKit Johnson / William Hergenhan vs Richard Crossley / Giles Clay6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBill Jackson / John Helmer III vs Steve Martini / Chris Fahlbusch6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesQuintin Yray / Rodrigo Aguilar vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2018-10-05Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Helmer III / Bill Jackson vs Brian Joelson / Bill Rhoades5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Keller / Brian Posewitz vs Steve Bidwell / Todd DeNeffe4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesQuintin Yray / William Hergenhan vs Mike Farrell / David Perzik6-2, 6-4
2018-09-30Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRodrigo Aguilar / Richard Keller vs Paul Miller / Giles Clay6-4, 1-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Helmer III / James Ringelberg vs David Williams / Robert Anderson6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesQuintin Yray / David Rodeback vs Steve Martini / Chris Fahlbusch6-3, 6-1
2018-09-22Won 21
L#1 DoublesJohn Helmer III / Brian Posewitz vs Deke Gundersen / Julian Evola6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRodrigo Aguilar / Kit Johnson vs Glenn Gerstmar / Eric Cooley3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Hall / William Hergenhan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Quintin Yray
3W–7L career · type S
not enough data
4.5
Rodrigo Aguilar
37W–36L career
38%62%0%
3.93
4
John Helmer III
16W–22L career
0%97%3%
3.85
4
James Hockley
31W–23L career · type S
not enough data
4
Brian Posewitz
45W–35L career
2%98%0%
3.73
4
William Hergenhan
56W–42L career
7%91%1%
3.71
4
James Ringelberg
73W–77L career
8%92%0%
3.63

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.