Teams

ATC RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs CACM GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennie Hewitt / Barbara Fraser vs Leigh Kingman / Julie McClung2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDarcee Mauger vs Michelle MacK6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHarriet LaMair / Valerie Stern vs Nancy Botiller / Suzanne Booth3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLina Wong-Kuljis / Amy Bryan vs Lise Uhrich / Susan High2-6, 1-6
2025-07-07vs GNO GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Bolt / Darcee Mauger vs Taylor Surroz / Meg Swearingen3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAllison Dodge vs Lori Kraatz4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesErin Forsey / Lina Wong-Kuljis vs Cheryl Badger / Deanne Vizurraga3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-30vs VC REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesDarcee Mauger / Barbara Fraser vs Amy McDevitt / Meghan Baker6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHarriet LaMair vs Shannon Kasperbauer0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Dodge / Kim Bolt vs Stephanie McCoy / Anne Elmquist4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLina Wong-Kuljis / Chris Fisher vs Anna Steele / Molly Weaver7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-23vs CHCC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesBarbara Fraser / Jennie Hewitt vs Allison Stassen / Carlee Steck3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAllison Dodge vs Allison Perkins6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKim Bolt / Harriet LaMair vs Courtney Berglund / Holly Garnsey3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChris Fisher / Dana Katz vs Angela Lercara / Kirstin Simmons4-6, 3-6
2025-06-16vs EM GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesKim Bolt / Jennie Hewitt vs Joy Jensen / Stephanie Sciez4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBarbara Fraser vs Sarah Warfield4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllison Dodge / Chris Fisher vs Jennifer Welte / Beth Toth0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Bryan / Dana Katz vs Hillary Cecil / Lisa Ide0-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs GCC NAVYLost 13
W#1 DoublesJennie Hewitt / Barbara Fraser vs Kathryn Santoro / Christine Viney6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesErin Forsey vs Alicia Sloan7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesValerie Stern / Kim Bolt vs Lori Marks-Connors / Katherine Crisham0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllison Dodge / Amy Bryan vs Ilana Larson / Marissa Sproles1-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs SKY BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Fraser / Darcee Mauger vs Angie Sanders / Mychael Jones4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAllison Dodge vs Kelly Gloeckler2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKim Bolt / Jennie Hewitt vs Sharon Alton / Kerry Hutcheson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Barbara Fraser
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.85
Jennie Hewitt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Darcee Mauger
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.79
Sarah Pucillo
published
2.78
Erin Forsey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Valerie Stern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Lina Wong-Kuljis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Dana Katz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.57
Allison Dodge
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Kim Bolt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Harriet LaMair
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lina Wong-Kuljis + Jennie Hewitt3454% games+6.5% vs expected
Barbara Fraser + Lina Wong-Kuljis6359% games+2.1% vs expected
Barbara Fraser + Jennie Hewitt6263% games+2.0% vs expected
Harriet LaMair + Kim Bolt3347% games−10.8% vs expected
Barbara Fraser + Darcee Mauger4259% gamesnot enough data
Kim Bolt + Valerie Stern2341% gamesnot enough data
Kim Bolt + Jennie Hewitt314 matchesnot enough data
Kim Bolt + Allison Dodge134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Barbara Fraser
39W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Jennie Hewitt
40W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Darcee Mauger
32W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Sarah Pucillo
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Erin Forsey
25W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Valerie Stern
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Lina Wong-Kuljis
24W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
2.5
Dana Katz
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.59
3
Allison Dodge
35W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Kim Bolt
25W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
2.5
Harriet LaMair
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.