Teams

Carson - RS Clay

2023 Escambia Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-01vs Escambia- Bevino - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristyn Miller / Tonna Wheat vs Donna Madison / Betty Wolff6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVicki Carson / Jeshua Reddecliff vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-25vs Escambia- Bevino - RS ClayLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeshua Reddecliff / Tracey Mcclurd vs Donna Madison / Shellie McCall5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTonna Wheat / Vicki Carson vs Janie Clark / Renee Bradford3-6, 0-6
2023-03-18vs Escambia- Bevino - RS ClayWon 21
W#1 DoublesVicki Carson / Tonna Wheat vs Betty Wolff / Renee Bradford6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracey Mcclurd / Jeshua Reddecliff vs Mecy Wimberly / Susan Nitterauer4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTerry Armstrong / Kristyn Miller vs Kelly Dempsey / Jean Lee6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-04vs Escambia- Bevino - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeshua Reddecliff / Tracey Mcclurd vs Tami McGhee / Diana Waters6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesVicki Carson / Emily Hillman vs Virginia Graybiel / Jean Lee2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-18vs Escambia- Bevino - RS ClayLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerry Armstrong / Kristyn Miller vs Tami McGhee / Betty Wolff3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesVicki Carson / Emily Hillman vs Virginia Graybiel / Jean Lee6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTonna Wheat / Tracey Mcclurd vs Debbie Cook / Shellie McCall6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-02-05vs Escambia- Bevino - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeshua Reddecliff / Kristyn Miller vs Renee Bradford / Shellie McCall1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Carson / Patricia Leahy vs Betty Wolff / Diana Waters4-6, 1-6
2023-01-28vs Escambia- Bevino - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeshua Reddecliff / Tracey Mcclurd vs Gina Bevino / Shellie McCall6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Tonna Wheat
published
3.53
Tracey Mcclurd
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.52
Kristyn Miller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Emily Hillman
published
Jeshua Reddecliff
published
Patricia Leahy
published
Terry Armstrong
published
Vicki Carson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tonna Wheat
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
Tracey Mcclurd
63W–107L career · 5 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kristyn Miller
134W–112L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Emily Hillman
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeshua Reddecliff
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Leahy
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terry Armstrong
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vicki Carson
32W–38L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.