Teams

Hershey CC - Terminetters (Myers)

2023 USTA 65 & Over League · 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-03vs RCW - Pink Ladies (Mac)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSue Myers / Beverly Paine vs Joy Rynier / Rene Battista3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Seiverling / Leslie Bloom vs Susan Kurtz / Mary Anne Linde2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Dolfi / Rebecca Cecere vs Kay Burrichter / Pamela J Hostetter2-6, 1-6
2023-07-27vs Wisehaven - HuntzingerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Seiverling / Sue Myers vs Cindy Rohrbaugh / Sharon Willow0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Paine / Leslie Bloom vs Sharon Williams / Rita Potter3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Dolfi / Donna Bauserman vs Jeri Myers / Deborah Mitzel1-6, 0-6
2023-07-25vs RCW - GleibermanLost 03
L#1 DoublesSue Myers / Beverly Paine vs Carolyn Salisbury / Marge Erb3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Bauserman / Linda Dolfi vs Carol Gleiberman / Susan Danowski-Miller2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Bloom / Rebecca Cecere vs Margaret Weik / Susan Eurich0-6, 3-6
2023-07-24vs Wisehaven - HuntzingerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Seiverling / Sue Myers vs Rita Potter / Deborah Waltimyer6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Paine / Leslie Bloom vs Paula Huntzinger / Lynn Newcomer1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Cecere / Linda Dolfi vs Jeri Myers / Deborah Mitzel0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesMary Seiverling / Sue Myers vs Linda Boyd / Debra Siefken0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Paine / Anna Ash vs Margaret Dunlap / Vivian Jugan6-7
L#3 DoublesDonna Bauserman / Linda Dolfi vs Diane Rabold / Muriel Crabbs4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-15vs RCW - GleibermanLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Seiverling / Sue Myers vs Debby Brooks / Susanne Nimmrichter5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBeverly Paine / Anna Ash vs Marge Erb / Bonnie Nolt6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Cecere / Leslie Bloom vs Carol Gleiberman / A Lucille Meissner1-6, 6-7
2023-05-31vs RCW - Pink Ladies (Mac)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Seiverling / Sue Myers vs Susan Kurtz / Mary Anne Linde6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnna Ash / Beverly Paine vs Joy Rynier / Rene Battista2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Bloom / Rebecca Cecere vs Kimberly Frey / Kay Burrichter2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSue Myers / Mary Seiverling vs Debra Siefken / Linda Isenberger3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Bauserman / Diana McLaughlin vs Susan Rebert / Vivian Jugan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSharon McTavish / Beverly Paine vs Denise Bachman / Muriel Crabbs6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RCW - Pink Ladies (Mac)0818617159
2Wisehaven - Huntzinger0817718164
3RCW - Gleiberman08141024210
4Gettysburg - Play it Forward (Matthews)08101431211
5Hershey CC - Terminetters (Myers)0812347282

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Mary Seiverling
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.88
Beverly Paine
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Anna Ash
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.66
Donna Bauserman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Linda Dolfi
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Leslie Bloom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sharon McTavish
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sue Myers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Paine + Mary Seiverling12755% games−0.6% vs expected
Donna Bauserman + Sue Myers81048% gamesnot enough data
Mary Seiverling + Sue Myers31336% gamesnot enough data
Donna Bauserman + Anna Ash6750% gamesnot enough data
Beverly Paine + Sue Myers11133% gamesnot enough data
Beverly Paine + Anna Ash4550% gamesnot enough data
Beverly Paine + Leslie Bloom2541% gamesnot enough data
Mary Seiverling + Donna Bauserman5257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Seiverling
96W–91L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Beverly Paine
41W–53L career · type A · 8 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Anna Ash
86W–117L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Donna Bauserman
38W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Linda Dolfi
50W–92L career · 12 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
Leslie Bloom
6W–17L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon McTavish
35W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sue Myers
34W–65L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.