Teams

LTFCS PLUMMER

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-19vs CCW JONESSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVicki Gess / Tami Hulsey vs Terry Olerich / Renee Crisler1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Hilton / Terri Plummer vs April Falk / Susan Turner6-3, 6-2
2021-07-12vs MEMPK MCCARRONLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarrie Ingersoll / Vicki Gess vs Nancy Barker / Susan Schmidt3-6, 5-7
2021-07-05vs CSRC HENRYWon 10
W#3 DoublesVicki Gess / Tami Hulsey vs Jeannie Roeber / Deb Shipwash6-3, 6-3
2021-06-28vs PBTC HENSONLost 01
L#3 DoublesVicki Gess / Debra Orton vs Linda Sanchez / Paula Henson0-6, 1-6
2021-06-14vs CCW JONESWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Moore / Terri Plummer vs Christine Butler / Sonia Garrison6-4, 6-4
2021-06-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesTerri Plummer / Tatiana Merkoulova vs Angela Sullivan / Beth Spargo7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Jessica Hilton
published
Carrie Ingersoll
published 4
Debra Orton
published 4
3.55
Deborah Scruggs
published 4
3.38
Tatiana Merkoulova
published
3.38
Terri Plummer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Anne Ryals
published 3.5
2.97
Vicki Gess
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Daria Parker
published
Kimberly Peterson
published
Tami Hulsey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Plummer + Kimberly Peterson4254% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Gess + Terri Plummer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Hilton
99W–44L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Carrie Ingersoll
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Debra Orton
5W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Deborah Scruggs
14W–20L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
Tatiana Merkoulova
17W–33L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Terri Plummer
57W–80L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Anne Ryals
24W–19L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Vicki Gess
54W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
Daria Parker
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kimberly Peterson
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tami Hulsey
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.