Teams

WP-C BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-26vs CACM BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesJosh Galvin / Jason Wittenstein vs Douglas Adams / Steven Naviaux6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNicholas Saggese vs Brian Grundy3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesWalter Trobaugh vs Nic Yorchak3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Boland / Terry Payette vs Robert Cohen / Scott Hampel3-6, 4-6
2026-05-23vs DTC GREENWon 32
W#1 DoublesDaniel Levy / Neil Fyfe vs Daniel Thomas / Todd Wiebe6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBryan Sowers vs Fabian Neuenschwander3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTerry Payette / Nicholas Saggese vs Frank Daidone / Ted Marolt3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRyan Boland vs Zack Peterson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWalter Trobaugh / Michael Lim vs Matt Emmons / Kevin Prometheus Trotsky3-6, 6-7
2026-05-19vs GPTC GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesDaniel Levy / Jason Wittenstein vs Colby Berner / David Junta2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBryan Sowers vs Anuj Deshmukh6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNick Mullane / Neil Fyfe vs Noah Wasserman / Kyungsoo Jeong4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJosh Galvin vs Adam Beehler6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNicholas Saggese / Walter Trobaugh vs Peter Sarnataro / Viktor Bojilov4-6, 5-7
2026-05-12vs CM ORANGEWon 41
W#1 DoublesRyan Boland / Daniel Levy vs Laird Blue / William Dickey6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJosh Galvin vs Jonathan Kosares6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNeil Fyfe / Jason Wittenstein vs Matthew Parsons / Clint Cook6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesTerry Payette vs Taylor Weir2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesWalter Trobaugh / Nicholas Saggese vs David Tighe / Jim Roper6-4, 6-3
2026-04-28vs WP-C REDWon 41
W#1 DoublesBryan Sowers / Josh Galvin vs Nick Nyffeler / Abhijeet Dalvi6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJason Wittenstein vs Jonathan Kelly3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Lim / Ryan Boland vs Rodney Milton / Mark Anderson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDaniel Levy vs Jarrid DeMaio6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNeil Fyfe / Nick Mullane vs Jeffrey Merman / Greg Allen4-6, 4-6
2026-04-21vs CP REDWon 41
W#1 DoublesDaniel Levy / Tim Ryan vs Gene Martinez / Patrick Miller6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRyan Boland vs Clayton Dexter6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNick Mullane / Nicholas Saggese vs Michael Evans / Fritz Gale0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJosh Galvin vs Brennan Kaufman6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTerry Payette / Michael Lim vs JACK DONNELLY / Roland Eckenhausen7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-14vs GTC ORANGEWon 41
L#1 DoublesCharles Hall / Bryan Sowers vs Fred DeFilippo / Stephen Castro5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJosh Galvin vs Michael Simon7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNick Mullane / Jason Wittenstein vs Brad Hollis / Jack Zhou7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDaniel Levy vs Seamus Doyle6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Lim / Terry Payette vs Anthony Daldin / Joseph Erazo7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Josh Galvin
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.40
Daniel Levy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Ryan Boland
usually #1 Doubles 20%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Charles Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Walter Trobaugh
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.20
Nick Mullane
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Jason Wittenstein
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
Terry Payette
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.14
Bryan Sowers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Michael Lim
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Neil Fyfe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Nicholas Saggese
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Tim Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josh Galvin
6W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Daniel Levy
6W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
Ryan Boland
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Charles Hall
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Walter Trobaugh
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Nick Mullane
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Jason Wittenstein
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Terry Payette
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Bryan Sowers
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Michael Lim
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Neil Fyfe
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Nicholas Saggese
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
Tim Ryan
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.