Teams

Nelson

2022 Coppermine Adult 18 & Over · Coppermine Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesMargaret Grow-Sadler vs Carole Veihmeyer7-5, 6-3
2022-03-04vs CrawleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Michelle Tyde vs Marlo Newton / Linda Harrell6-3, 6-4
2022-02-25vs BiggsWon 20
W#1 SinglesMargaret Grow-Sadler vs Christina Hammond6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / April Wilmer vs Carole Veihmeyer / Kimberlee Schulden6-2, 6-0
2022-02-13vs CrawleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Aimee MacEda vs Dale Templeton / Andrea Smolen6-4, 6-0
2022-02-11vs BiggsWon 20
W#1 SinglesMargaret Grow-Sadler vs Christina Hammond6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAimee MacEda / Michelle Tyde vs Denise Litzau / Kimberlee Schulden6-2, 6-6
2022-02-04vs CrawleyWon 20
W#1 SinglesMargaret Grow-Sadler vs Grace Tran6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Michelle Tyde vs Betsy Morris / Marlo Newton6-0, 6-1
2022-01-30vs BiggsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMargaret Grow-Sadler / Ann Hall vs Courtney Robertson / Patrice Holtz6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAimee MacEda / Gena Rader vs Kimberlee Schulden / Denise Litzau6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Dianna Sinofsky
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Margaret Grow-Sadler
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
Aimee MacEda
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Michelle Tyde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.10
April Wilmer
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianna Sinofsky + Aimee MacEda8355% games+2.0% vs expected
Michelle Tyde + Dianna Sinofsky8751% games−16.2% vs expected
Michelle Tyde + Aimee MacEda5356% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dianna Sinofsky
43W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Margaret Grow-Sadler
40W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Aimee MacEda
27W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Michelle Tyde
39W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
2.5
April Wilmer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.