Teams

PRC - Steed

2026 B'ham Combo - 55 & Over W · D

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-15vs BHRC - ErnestWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Hanson / Anastasia Payne vs Elaine Reid / Shirley Vest7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKaren Keene / Laurie Rigsby vs Susan Harris / Kim Payne0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLynne Mohlenbrok / Brenda Cohen vs Laveda Bradford / Shelia Walker6-3, 6-1
2026-06-08vs PRC - HoneycuttLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynne Mohlenbrok / Anastasia Payne vs Kim Nolen / Sharon Travis0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKenny Powell / Brenda Cohen vs Tami Hansen / Suzette Pflaum2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Keene / Laurie Rigsby vs Kim Griffith / Tracey Dalzell Walsh2-6, 1-6
2026-05-18vs BHRC - ErnestLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynne Mohlenbrok / Linda Sink vs Jerrie Burns / Shirley Vest6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie Rigsby / Karen Keene vs Laveda Bradford / Kim Payne7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Hanson / Laurie Bennett vs Susan Harris / Mimi Smith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-11vs PRC - HoneycuttWon 21
L#1 DoublesKenny Powell / Brenda Cohen vs Kim Griffith / Sherry Clark5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLeslie Housman / Mary Hanson vs Kathy Honeycutt / Kim Chunn6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Rigsby / Karen Keene vs Kim Nolen / Suzette Pflaum6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Beth English
published 4.5
3.98
Lynne Mohlenbrok
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.97
Anastasia Payne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Linda Sink
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Karen Keene
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Leslie Housman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Kenny Powell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laurie Rigsby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Keene + Laurie Rigsby134 matchesnot enough data
Anastasia Payne + Linda Sink303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Beth English
11W–4L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.98
Lynne Mohlenbrok
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.98
4
Anastasia Payne
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.97
Linda Sink
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Karen Keene
28W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Leslie Housman
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
Kenny Powell
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
3.01
Laurie Rigsby
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Hanson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.