Teams

SPANISH BAY 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Nicole Truszkowski
published
3.54
Maria Eldridge
published
3.44
Erin High
published
3.37
Kim Tope
published
3.36
Nancy P Taylor
published
3.36
Lynette Vos
published
3.34
Kirstie Wilde
published
3.30
Sylvia Lee
published
3.21
ARIA Kirsebom
published 3.5
3.20
Tamami Pisano
published
3.18
Katie Klevan
published
3.15
Robin Flynn
published
3.11
Amy Brandt
published 3
3.01
Ann Artz
published 3
3.00
Aunikah Bastian
published 3
2.99
Krisanta Silva
published
2.97
Jennifer Stachel
published
2.94
Julie Mccullough
published
2.88
Anila Light
published 3
2.83
Dani Dayton
published 3
2.83
Erin Madeira
published
Mary Scherer
published
Sharla Klingel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy P Taylor + Erin High4148% games−6.6% vs expected
Amy Brandt + Erin High5171% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Stachel + Katie Klevan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Truszkowski
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Maria Eldridge
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
Erin High
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Kim Tope
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Nancy P Taylor
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Lynette Vos
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Kirstie Wilde
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Sylvia Lee
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
ARIA Kirsebom
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Tamami Pisano
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Katie Klevan
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Robin Flynn
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Amy Brandt
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Ann Artz
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Aunikah Bastian
5W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Krisanta Silva
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Jennifer Stachel
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Julie Mccullough
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Anila Light
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Dani Dayton
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Erin Madeira
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.83
Mary Scherer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharla Klingel
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.