Teams

SGV Wild Crickets-Tang-APU/SU9

2026 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.5

25 players · average NTRP 4.46 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesAUSTIN HARVILL / Hoa Do vs Alexander Ko / Michael Cheng6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKaden Salvador vs Shaurya Dhankar6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Mason / Daniel Carlton vs Jerry Shi / Bill Petrocelli3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesJoey Takehara vs Pablo Primucci3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEric Barnard / Eric Lu vs Nicholas Ambrosio / Ky Vo6-0, 7-6
W#1 DoublesAUSTIN HARVILL / Eric Barnard vs Bill Petrocelli / David Kim6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEric Lu / Jeffrey Visava vs Sebastian Koh / Raymond Thai6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesFarbod Farmand vs Alan Han2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEric Gyi / Chad Rodriguez vs TEVIN JENKINS / Nicholas Ambrosio6-7, 5-7
W#1 DoublesHoa Do / James Mason vs Bill Petrocelli / TEVIN JENKINS5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPai-Kuan Peng vs Pablo Primucci6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesISMAEL RODRIGUEZ / Joey Takehara vs Alexander Ko / Alan Han7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHe Yang Li vs Jerry Shi4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEric Lu / Jeffrey Visava vs Richard Phung / Sam Yang6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesAUSTIN HARVILL / Hoa Do vs Jerry Shi / Bill Petrocelli6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEric Barnard vs Cedric Lozano6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaden Salvador / Eric Gyi vs Alexander Ko / Michael Cheng6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPai-Kuan Peng vs Shaurya Dhankar0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Visava / Eric Lu vs Alan Han / Richard Phung6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesHoa Do / Paul Vincent Salvador vs Jerry Shi / Bill Petrocelli5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmbrose Trear vs Alexander Ko1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJames Mason / Daniel Carlton vs Nicholas Ambrosio / Ky Vo6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesVictor Paitimusa vs Sebastian Koh3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEric Gyi / Ron Chow vs Alan Han / Richard Phung2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKimlong Phan / Eric Lu vs Bill Petrocelli / Sam Yang6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLuciano Rodriguez vs Pablo Primucci5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEric Barnard / James Mason vs Nicholas Ambrosio / Alan Han6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesHe Yang Li vs Shaurya Dhankar0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHoa Do / Chad Rodriguez vs Alexander Ko / Leonardo Kim6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesKimlong Phan / Ron Chow vs Bill Petrocelli / Michael Cheng7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesPai-Kuan Peng vs Shaurya Dhankar0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Visava / Eric Lu vs TEVIN JENKINS / Sam Yang6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesEric Barnard vs Pablo Primucci6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesISMAEL RODRIGUEZ / Chad Rodriguez vs Nicholas Ambrosio / Alexander Ko6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesEric Barnard / Luciano Rodriguez vs Bill Petrocelli / Sam Yang5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHe Yang Li vs Shaurya Dhankar2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHoa Do / Eric Gyi vs Alan Han / Renaldo Goncalves6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAUSTIN HARVILL vs Pablo Primucci6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKimlong Phan / Eric Lu vs Nicholas Ambrosio / Alexander Ko5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SGV - Men 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGV LLW Noobies- Petrocelli-San Marino HS/SA10/1253211946376
2SGV Wild Crickets-Tang-APU/SU935192146366

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.57
AUSTIN HARVILL
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.56
Hoa Do
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.47
Eric Lu
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.39
Jeffrey Visava
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.36
Daniel Carlton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.35
Kaden Salvador
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.34
Eric Gyi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.33
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.32
Victor Paitimusa
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.31
Kimlong Phan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.27
Colin Tang
published 4
Ambrose Trear
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Arya Moknat
published 4.5
Farbod Farmand
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
He Yang Li
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Luciano Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.21
Chad Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Michael Marley
published
4.18
Paul Vincent Salvador
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Charles Barrantes
published 4.5
4.12
Pai-Kuan Peng
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.09
Joey Takehara
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.00
Eric Barnard
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4.5
Kevin Dupont
published
Ron Chow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Lu + Jeffrey Visava404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
AUSTIN HARVILL
22W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
4.57
4.5
Hoa Do
23W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
4.56
4.5
Eric Lu
8W–0L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
4.47
Jeffrey Visava
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
Daniel Carlton
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
4.36
Kaden Salvador
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Eric Gyi
20W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.33
Victor Paitimusa
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
4.32
Kimlong Phan
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
4.31
4
Colin Tang
17W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
4.27
4.5
Ambrose Trear
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Arya Moknat
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Farbod Farmand
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
He Yang Li
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Luciano Rodriguez
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Chad Rodriguez
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.21
Michael Marley
11W–12L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
Paul Vincent Salvador
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Charles Barrantes
138W–93L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
Pai-Kuan Peng
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.12
Joey Takehara
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Eric Barnard
5W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
Kevin Dupont
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ron Chow
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.