Teams

LLW SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU8

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesKeiko Kagan / Kathleen Janisch vs Sonia Cassatt / Hae Oh6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesTiffany Yu / Ennie Gonzaga vs Diane Hom / Raylynn Roland6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKeiko Kagan / Kathleen Janisch vs Susan Cardona / Mara Watkins6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesEnnie Gonzaga / Tiffany Yu vs Rumduol Vuong / Darlene Scott6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSandra Zane / Pam Barbato vs Patricia Ash / Betsy Weinberger6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKeiko Kagan / Kathleen Janisch vs Diana Baylor / Dede Schneider6-2, 6-2
2023-11-11vs SGV CA Rollers- Shimizu-WN/SU10Won 10
W#2 DoublesEnnie Gonzaga / DENISE GICK vs Maryann Brandon / Claire Gibbs6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesPam Barbato / Rebecca Berman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesEnnie Gonzaga / Tiffany Yu vs Antoinette Lessuk / Christina Kim6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSandra Zane / Joanna Gardner vs Gail Gerbode / Feiming Morgan4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKathleen Janisch / Keiko Kagan vs Susan Lee / Suzie Sarkisian6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Ennie Gonzaga
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Karen Beutler
published
3.46
Nancy Ray
published
3.32
Stacey Zhao
published
3.31
Pam Barbato
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Keiko Kagan
published
3.24
Leslie Jiang
published
3.22
Rebecca Berman
published
3.15
Kathleen Janisch
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Joanna Gardner
published
3.03
Sandra Zane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.49
Chris Helberg
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Jiang + Sandra Zane2446% games−3.0% vs expected
Sandra Zane + Pam Barbato2642% gamesnot enough data
Ennie Gonzaga + Sandra Zane4260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ennie Gonzaga
112W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Karen Beutler
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
3.59
Nancy Ray
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Stacey Zhao
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.32
3.5
Pam Barbato
100W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Keiko Kagan
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Leslie Jiang
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Rebecca Berman
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Kathleen Janisch
60W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Joanna Gardner
29W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Sandra Zane
146W–141L career · 2 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Chris Helberg
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.