Teams

PINOLE PK 55AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesCliff Liang / Simon Kwan vs Peter Comes / Dennis Ciriaco4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJamie Tull / Gary Hazard vs Benito Feria / Roland Ramos5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlan Biocca / Don Scettrini vs Chris Dao / Wayne Spencer6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Don Scettrini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Cliff Liang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Bob Benz
published 3.5
3.46
Andre Vernon
published 3.5
3.43
Moshrek Sobhy
published
3.34
Matthew Mccormick
published
3.29
Albert Chu
published 3.5
3.12
Alan Biocca
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.10
Richard Jung
published
2.92
Craig McAllister
published 3.5
2.63
Dale Lifson
published 3
Ed Wong
published
Gary Hazard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jamie Tull
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Brummitt
published
Simon Kwan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andre Vernon + Bob Benz314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Don Scettrini
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.92
4
Cliff Liang
9W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
3.5
Bob Benz
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Andre Vernon
27W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Moshrek Sobhy
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Matthew Mccormick
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Albert Chu
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Alan Biocca
16W–3L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Richard Jung
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Craig McAllister
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Dale Lifson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Ed Wong
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gary Hazard
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Tull
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Randy Brummitt
11W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Simon Kwan
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.