← Teams

THPRD-Rankin 5.0

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Phalkun Mam
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
—
Geoffrey Schwind
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results9 ties
2023-08-12Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesPhalkun Mam vs Mathieu Garcia6-3, 6-4
2023-08-12Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesPhalkun Mam / Ian Paik vs Spencer Watanabe / John Closi7-6, 6-2
2023-08-11Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesPhalkun Mam / Ian Paik vs Christopher Rice / Ken Bang1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-25Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJesus Javier Ruiz Rojas / Geoffrey Schwind vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-18Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesPhalkun Mam / Geoffrey Schwind vs Eric Ledwith / Cameron Paulsen6-2, 6-4
2023-03-11Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesPhalkun Mam / Christopher Evola vs Rudd McGarity / Mark Taylor6-0, 6-3
2023-02-19Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesGeoffrey Schwind / Phalkun Mam vs Chris Merrill / Benjamin Valenti4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-02-04Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesPhalkun Mam / Gordon Barrows vs Marco Pineda / Connor Leahy6-1, 6-2
2023-01-29Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesPhalkun Mam / Ian Paik vs Brent Chin / Sean Eberle2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5
Phalkun Mam
44W–29L career
not enough data
—
0
Geoffrey Schwind
10W–5L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.