Teams

Kontoulas DAY

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Women 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Lemmons (Day)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesClaudia Barnett / Ann Schuelke vs Janis Eldridge / Ann Weaver6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Kogler / Andrea Zoller vs Beverly Memory / Deb Nelson7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Gick / Barbara Burke vs Uschi Raboese / Carolyn Kingman4-6, 3-3
2026-08-21vs Fenton/Richard DLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Birle / Julianne Ralph vs Kathleen Epperly / SUSAN TANTILLO1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Kogler / Claudia Barnett vs Tara Duckworth / Michelle Bowen1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDori Seamans / Cheryl Holland vs Dena Daybell / Robin Siegel1-6, 3-6
2026-08-17vs Graeser 2026 55+ 6.5 ComboLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Birle / Julianne Ralph vs Shameena Broach / Katherine O'Bryan6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Schuelke / Karen Kontoulas vs Leslie Pickens / Julie Scull7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Gick / Christine Dacko vs Shelley Livengood / Christine Bean1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fenton/Richard D2051332
2Pelton/Daly DAY2042546
3Cesareo (DAY)1030013
4Graeser 2026 55+ 6.5 Combo1021327
5Weeks (Day) Fall 2026 Combo1133754
6MacCall000000
7Stephanski/Hollett-Mott000000
8Sample 55-6.5000000
9Ferner Combo0112430
10Lemmons (Day)0112530
11Doss 55+ Combo0112531
12Kear/Lepari0103636
13Kontoulas DAY02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Ann Schuelke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Bett Lewis
published 3.5
3.18
Jennifer Gick
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
Andrea Zoller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Karen O'Connor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Claudia Barnett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Cheryl Holland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Dori Seamans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Karen Kontoulas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Christine Dacko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Julianne Ralph
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Kogler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Birle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Stahl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen O'Connor + Andrea Zoller303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Schuelke
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Bett Lewis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Gick
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Andrea Zoller
13W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Karen O'Connor
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Claudia Barnett
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cheryl Holland
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Dori Seamans
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.56
Karen Kontoulas
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Christine Dacko
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Julianne Ralph
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Kogler
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Birle
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Stahl
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.