Teams

3-KMcWhorter-HVCC

2023 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-04-25vs 6-AYoung-EVWon 20
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Angela Nesius7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRhiannon Ludington vs Shannon Bartle6-1, 6-2
2023-04-20vs 4-ENeilson-EnoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Caroline Yu3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRhiannon Ludington / Belen Diaz Cisneros vs Faten Habib / Kristy Dumlao6-2, 6-0
2023-04-11vs 5-LCaldwell-SVLost 01
L#1 DoublesKensy Ryan / Rhiannon Ludington vs Laura Caldwell / Laura Gallaher3-6, 4-6
2023-04-06vs 2-JDeConto/AKlein-EnoWon 10
W#2 SinglesRhiannon Ludington vs Erica Shirts6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-30vs 12-SGraff - EnoLost 01
L#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Lauren Muth Humphreys2-6, 4-6
2023-03-28vs 11-KLaan-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Joyce Robinson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Everett / Rhiannon Ludington vs Wendy Lindberg / Kristi Laan2-6, 1-6
2023-03-23vs 1-DBaker-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Becki Cleveland6-2, 6-2
2023-03-14vs 9-LDubois-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRhiannon Ludington / Caroline Irish vs Danielle Nader / Blake Ellis6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Christina Pipkin5-7, 5-7
2023-03-09vs 10-TPrinstein-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Drew Scruggs6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRhiannon Ludington vs Kim Cabelka6-3, 7-5
2023-02-23vs 8-KGreen-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Che-Jung Chang6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Kim McWhorter
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Rhiannon Ludington
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.05
Cecily Peterson
usually #1 Singles 92%, also #2 Singles 8% · published 3
3.03
Deborah Hertzog
published 3
2.90
Valerie Michael
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Elizabeth Everett
published
2.59
Kensy Ryan
published
2.56
Sterling Ingui
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim McWhorter + Valerie Michael5360% gamesnot enough data
Sterling Ingui + Rhiannon Ludington134 matchesnot enough data
Kim McWhorter + Rhiannon Ludington224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim McWhorter
223W–79L career · 15 lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.59
3
Rhiannon Ludington
93W–83L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
3.14
3
Cecily Peterson
207W–207L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Deborah Hertzog
24W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Valerie Michael
58W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Elizabeth Everett
8W–20L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
Kensy Ryan
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Sterling Ingui
43W–78L career · 4 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.