Teams

Pennsbury Tricksters

Adult Tri-Level League · Tri Level Women 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-29vs AGC ACESLost 03
L#1 DoublesShara Aaron / Ann Fisher vs Stephanie Finnerty / Diane Walsh3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Tracey / Dawn Keaton vs Jill Hynes / Diane Doane7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Mangas / Yolandi Baker vs Tara Bucci / Jody Staples0-6, 2-6
2025-10-22vs Hot ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesShara Aaron / Katelyn Reilly vs Kirsten Fox / Sarah Schlotfeldt6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Tracey / Dawn Keaton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Carpineta / Allison Bloch vs Stephanie Giordano / Lori Miceli6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-15vs LaskowskiWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Bacso / Ann Fisher vs Amanda Frantz / Mihaela Popa1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Tracey / Dawn Keaton vs Marina Giolas / Vanessa Halloran1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYolandi Baker / Barbara Mangas vs Nicole Costelloe / Laura Will6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-08vs AGC ACESLost 12
L#1 DoublesShara Aaron / Jill Bacso vs Diane Walsh / Gayle Connelly5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Keaton / Ann Tracey vs Gwynne Barnes / Brooke McDermott6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesYolandi Baker / Barbara Mangas vs Mary Marshall / Elizabeth Finley7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-10-01vs Hot ShotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesHilary Sperling / Ann Fisher vs Sarah Schlotfeldt / Chrissy Schuck2-3
L#2 DoublesDawn Keaton / Ann Tracey vs Kirsten Fox / Amela Shankar7-6, 0-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYolandi Baker / Barbara Mangas vs Stephanie Giordano / Joelle Rotay6-4, 4-1
2025-09-24vs LaskowskiLost 02
L#1 DoublesHilary Sperling / Katelyn Reilly vs Lee Leary / Alyssa Burkhardt1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Carpineta / Allison Bloch vs Nicole Costelloe / Laura Will3-6, 2-6
2025-09-17vs AGC ACESWon 30
W#1 DoublesShara Aaron / Katelyn Reilly vs Stephanie Finnerty / Diane Walsh6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Tracey / Dawn Keaton vs Kathleen Chambers / Mary Marshall6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Carpineta / Allison Bloch vs Julia Bartosh / Elizabeth Finley6-4, 6-4
2025-09-10vs Hot ShotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesShara Aaron / Katelyn Reilly vs Julie Granson / Sarah Schlotfeldt6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnn Tracey / Dawn Keaton vs Bridget Hallman / Alison Vachris7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJeannine Wachinski / Barbara Mangas vs Joelle Rotay / Jessica Corrigan7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-03vs LaskowskiLost 12
L#1 DoublesShara Aaron / Hilary Sperling vs Maria Davidson / Amanda Laskowski7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDawn Keaton / Ann Tracey vs Diana Almada / Danielle Turner6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeannine Wachinski / Barbara Mangas vs Nicole Costelloe / Rachel Chadwin4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Tri Level Women 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Laskowski54161125194
2AGC ACES54151229227
3Pennsbury Tricksters54141331240
4Hot Shots3691839268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Jill Bacso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Hilary Sperling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Ann Fisher
published 4.5
4.18
Shara Aaron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Ann Tracey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Dawn Keaton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Allison Bloch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Yolandi Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Susan Carpineta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Jeannine Wachinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Barbara Mangas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Katelyn Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Fisher + Shara Aaron301059% games+10.4% vs expected
Yolandi Baker + Susan Carpineta6261% games+7.6% vs expected
Jill Bacso + Shara Aaron10365% games+7.0% vs expected
Jeannine Wachinski + Susan Carpineta6550% games+6.2% vs expected
Barbara Mangas + Yolandi Baker8456% games+5.7% vs expected
Dawn Keaton + Ann Tracey1768556% games+3.4% vs expected
Jeannine Wachinski + Yolandi Baker4547% games+1.2% vs expected
Barbara Mangas + Jeannine Wachinski141350% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Bacso
40W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Hilary Sperling
56W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Ann Fisher
47W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shara Aaron
113W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4
Ann Tracey
310W–221L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Dawn Keaton
257W–145L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
3.5
Allison Bloch
281W–149L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.48
3.5
Yolandi Baker
209W–109L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Susan Carpineta
157W–125L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Jeannine Wachinski
95W–117L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Barbara Mangas
56W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Katelyn Reilly
25W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.