Teams

Fee - Luer

2022 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.94 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-13vs Kiwi - SalvatoreWon 20
W#2 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Pandora Springer vs Allison Wyand / Melanie McManus6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Anne Burns vs Amy Petty / Julianne Moore6-3, 6-4
2022-06-06vs Rockledge - KubeLost 01
L#1 SinglesRenee Jiannine vs Lisa LeDoux4-6, 2-6
2022-05-23vs Brevard - TTC / LeiterLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Erin Conway vs Tammy Bertolini / Leslie Pankey1-6, 3-6
2022-05-16vs Rockledge - KubeLost 01
L#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs Jenny Mullowney7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-10vs EGYC - MitzLost 01
L#1 SinglesRenee Jiannine vs Kerry Sutton6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Deborah Phillips vs Pamela Starkey / Laura Rochester6-0, 6-3
2022-04-18vs TTC - TaylorLost 02
L#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs Terra Hovan3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Ginger Ballou vs Trisha Watson / Lisa Shaffer6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-11vs Suntree - FordLost 02
L#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Debra Grayson vs Darien Lawrence / Anastasia Mika7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Janice Waltmeyer vs Tandy Baerst / Linda White6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Stephanie Tran
published
3.23
Deborah Phillips
published 3.5
2.92
Renee Jiannine
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.75
Allison Moorhead
published 3
Ginger Ballou
published 3
2.68
Erin Conway
published 3
2.66
Janice Waltmeyer
published
2.27
Anne Burns
published 2.5
1.86
Debra Grayson
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharyn Luer + Renee Jiannine13659% games+10.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Tran
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Deborah Phillips
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Renee Jiannine
104W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Allison Moorhead
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Daricca Facciobene
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ginger Ballou
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Erin Conway
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Janice Waltmeyer
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
2.5
Anne Burns
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Debra Grayson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.