Teams

GR-Hare JJ's Boys (55s 7.5M)

2026 Neuse River Combo 55 & Over · 55s 7.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 14 7:00 PM
Greene Ridge Racquet Club
Sep 21 7:00 PM
Greene Ridge Racquet Club
2026-09-01vs GR-Taylor Deuce's (55s 7.5M)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Jones / Allen Elmore vs Andy Varnell / John Turner4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJay Jennings / Brock Felton vs Neil Baddour / Brad Warnock4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJimmy Hare / TJ Thomas vs Danny Davis / Bruce Daughety3-6, 2-6
2026-08-17vs GR-Taylor Deuce's (55s 7.5M)Split 11
L#1 DoublesBrock Felton / Kenneth Kornegay vs Andy Varnell / John Turner6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAllen Elmore / Jay Jennings vs Larry Mann / Bruce Daughety7-6, 6-4
2026-08-10vs EM-Whitley (55s 7.5M)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKenneth Kornegay / Carl Seymour vs Andy Wilkinson / Jeff Gravelin7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJay Jennings / Allen Elmore vs Robert Whitley / Rich Ferragina4-6, 5-7
2026-08-08vs GR-Taylor Deuce's (55s 7.5M)Won 20
W#2 DoublesKenneth Kornegay / Carl Seymour vs J Scott McConnaughey / Neil Baddour6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTJ Thomas / Jimmy Hare vs Michael Colie / Ken Drake6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 55s 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EM-Whitley (55s 7.5M)3063781
2GR-Hare JJ's Boys (55s 7.5M)2154985
3GR-Taylor Deuce's (55s 7.5M)044818135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Brock Felton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
TJ Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Allen Elmore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Carl Seymour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Jimmy Hare
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jay Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kenneth Kornegay
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allen Elmore + Brock Felton303 matchesnot enough data
Allen Elmore + Carl Seymour123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brock Felton
27W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
TJ Thomas
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Allen Elmore
9W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Carl Seymour
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jimmy Hare
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Jay Jennings
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kenneth Kornegay
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.