Teams

Ossman 7042117700

Z-Refunded Players · Adult Leagues

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Adult Leagues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ossman 7042117700000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Palina Beck
published
4.30
3.88
Botum Chhay
published 4
3.83
3.82
Tammy Jirjis
published
3.82
Cindy Mccullough
published 4
3.79
Noi Sengsouk
published
Brenda Ossman
published 4
3.74
Janet Adamson
published
3.71
Loralie Liggett
published
3.66
Maura Fitzgerald
published
3.50
Donna Demouy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Botum Chhay + Maura Fitzgerald5260% games−7.1% vs expected
Palina Beck + PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO123 matchesnot enough data
Noi Sengsouk + Janet Adamson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Palina Beck
20W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.37
PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO
5W–17L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
4
Botum Chhay
11W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.88
Elizabeth Csernovicz
27W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Tammy Jirjis
18W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Cindy Mccullough
39W–31L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
Noi Sengsouk
19W–6L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Janet Adamson
28W–10L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Loralie Liggett
19W–23L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Maura Fitzgerald
17W–14L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Donna Demouy
15W–16L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.