Teams

WOCC Stringer

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-09vs ACAC NaylorWon 10
W#1 SinglesRebecca Hendrix vs Dina Weddle6-4, 4-6
2023-06-07vs ACAC CamdenWon 10
W#2 SinglesRebecca Hendrix vs Stacy McLeod6-2, 6-1
2023-05-24vs HCC Ross / BoydWon 10
W#1 SinglesRebecca Hendrix vs Thu-Hang Groome6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Liz Charles
published
Betsy Kersey
published 4
3.69
Rebecca Hendrix
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.44
Morgan Hutter
published
3.39
Cheri Stringer
published 3.5
3.15
Kelly Gregory
published
3.10
Anne-Marie Anderson
published 3.5
3.04
Sule Sauvigne
published
2.86
Emily Kennedy
published
Erin Strunk
published
Susan Mangin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liz Charles
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Betsy Kersey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Hendrix
49W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Morgan Hutter
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Cheri Stringer
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
Kelly Gregory
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Anne-Marie Anderson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Sule Sauvigne
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Emily Kennedy
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.86
Erin Strunk
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.