Teams

Watts 2.5W Fall Singles

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 2.5 Women Fall Singles

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-14vs Barnes 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesJenifer Checo vs Meredith Lantz6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKatlyn Staub vs Lyndsey Grubb6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesErica Harden vs Tamenika Delgado6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTia Opyd vs Kim Burgess4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJenifer Checo vs Lauren Breedlove6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Helen Skeen6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKatlyn Staub vs Kimberly Bly6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTia Opyd vs Allison Winters2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTia Opyd vs Jenna Bialik-Speight7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJenifer Checo vs Allison Chisholm6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesErica Harden vs Noelle Budzyn0-6, 1-6
2025-09-16vs Hanger 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesTia Opyd vs Cassandra Thompson6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesErica Harden vs Heather Barber1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Carrie Hanger6-2, 6-1
2025-09-09vs Barnes 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesJenifer Checo vs Meredith Lantz6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTia Opyd vs Karin Rochester7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Janice Wuebker6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesErica Harden vs Kim Burgess0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKatlyn Staub vs Kari Faulkner6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesErica Harden vs Kimberly Bly2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Mary Catherine Hartley1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJenifer Checo vs Allison Chisholm2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesTia Opyd vs Annette Bagnoli6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Jenna Bialik-Speight7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Jenifer Checo
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.48
Tia Opyd
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.38
Allyson Wood
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 42% · published 3
2.38
Lorraine Rusch
published
2.15
Erica Harden
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Katlyn Staub
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenifer Checo
30W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%13%87%
2.66
Tia Opyd
21W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
3
Allyson Wood
15W–24L career · type S · 12 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Lorraine Rusch
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Erica Harden
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Katlyn Staub
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nakisha Boulware Watts
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.