Teams

TOC.Adams

2024 CTRL Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Combo 55 & Over 8.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-29vs TOC.JavalkarWon 10
W#2 DoublesCraig Cardella / David Bruner vs William Carter / Srinath Ekkad3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-22vs TOC.MadiaLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Bruner / Claude Ruffieux vs Thomas McEvoy / Jeffrey Madia1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Cardella / Richard Kimball vs Erik J Erikson / Tom Morrow6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-12vs TOC.JavalkarWon 10
W#2 DoublesClaude Ruffieux / Craig Cardella vs Srinath Ekkad / Michael Didner6-4, 6-3
2024-09-08vs TOC.JavalkarWon 20
W#2 DoublesClaude Ruffieux / Alex Newman vs James Klemenz / Ken Nowell7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCraig Cardella / Bill Brown vs Edward Li / Michael Didner7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-04vs TOC.MadiaWon 10
W#1 DoublesHady Abi-Aad / David Bruner vs Krister Eriksson / Dirk German3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-08-18vs TOC.JavalkarWon 10
W#2 DoublesHady Abi-Aad / Claude Ruffieux vs William Carter / James Klemenz6-3, 6-3
2024-08-11vs TOC.MadiaLost 03
L#1 DoublesHady Abi-Aad / David Bruner vs Tom Larrichio / Scott Riley6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCraig Cardella / Bill Brown vs Steve Faltz / Dirk German3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesClaude Ruffieux / Dennis Coon vs Bruce Moore / Tom Morrow3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 55 & Over 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Hady Abi-Aad
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.88
Craig Cardella
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.76
Bill Brown
published 4
3.73
Claude Ruffieux
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Dennis Coon
published 4
3.66
Richard Kimball
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claude Ruffieux + Craig Cardella3743% games+2.3% vs expected
Claude Ruffieux + Hady Abi-Aad5847% gamesnot enough data
Hady Abi-Aad + Craig Cardella2539% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hady Abi-Aad
30W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
4
Craig Cardella
53W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Bill Brown
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Claude Ruffieux
125W–153L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Dennis Coon
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Richard Kimball
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.