Teams

Calamari/55/3.0-4.0/SLI/HJC

2025 Slidell Tri Level 55 & Over - Men · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Slidell (55&O) Men

11 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-16vs Slidell/55/3.0-4.0/Sli/HJCWon 21
W#1 DoublesHenry P Calamari / James Pear vs Ernest Anderson / Daniel Brennan6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Bacino / Scott White vs Dave Kronlage / Stan Elmore6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Wellman / Torrey Reily vs Kevin Pearson / Barry Salsbury4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-09vs Slidell/55/3.0-4.0/Sli/HJCWon 20
W#1 DoublesHenry P Calamari / James Pear vs Ernest Anderson / Daniel Brennan6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTorrey Reily / Ladson Poole vs Barry Salsbury / Christopher Villa Jr6-3, 6-0
2025-07-02vs Slidell/55/3.0-4.0/Sli/HJCWon 20
W#1 DoublesHenry P Calamari / Scott White vs Ernest Anderson / Daniel Brennan6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTorrey Reily / Peter Weil vs Christopher Villa Jr / Kevin Pearson6-0, 6-1
2025-06-25vs Slidell/55/3.0-4.0/Sli/HJCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Lee / James Pear vs Ernest Anderson / Daniel Brennan6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Wellman / Joe Mitchell vs Richard Armond / Stan Elmore7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPeter Weil / Torrey Reily vs Stephen Deep / Kevin Pearson6-0, 6-1
2025-06-11vs Slidell/55/3.0-4.0/Sli/HJCWon 20
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Bacino / Michael Wellman vs Stan Elmore / Richard Armond7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Weil / Ladson Poole vs Christopher Villa Jr / Barry Salsbury6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Slidell (55&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Henry P Calamari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
James Vining
published
3.31
Jack Pecot
published
3.24
Jeffrey Bacino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Ladson Poole
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Michael Wellman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Peter Weil
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Joe Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Pear
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Torrey Reily
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wayne Songy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Henry P Calamari
22W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
James Vining
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Jack Pecot
16W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Jeffrey Bacino
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Ladson Poole
33W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Michael Wellman
23W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Peter Weil
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
Joe Mitchell
37W–57L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
James Pear
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Torrey Reily
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wayne Songy
11W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.