Teams

22 Westwood Warfield 7.0

2025 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-29vs 4 SCC Consolvo 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Bishop / Procter Fishburne vs EJ Watkins / Parker Coon2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKennon Harrison / Lauren King vs Kendall Consolvo / Brian Consolvo7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMark Wickersham / Elizabeth West vs Scott Broaddus / Erin Garrett1-6, 3-6
2025-03-23vs 2 ACAC Krebs 7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKate Hamilton / Procter Fishburne vs Grace Kim / Sihong Suy6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCherie Warfield / Kirby Fields vs Anant Singh / Sarah Estes5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesErin Gardner / Brad Rodgers vs Alice Yang / David Knudson3-6, 2-6
2025-03-01vs 26 MAC-White 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMark Wickersham / Christine Albrecht vs Ariel Mejia / Kaitlyn Mejia7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2025-02-15vs 21 ACAC Sloppy Joes 7.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesKennon Harrison / Christine Albrecht vs Yasmin Lutterbie / Mark Lutterbie6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCaren Payne / Robert Nilson vs Jean Davis / Ken Hatcher5-7, 6-7
2025-02-01vs 16 MAC Talamo 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKennon Harrison / Christine Albrecht vs David Brown / Lisa Yost4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-01-18vs 14 CCV Butler 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Albrecht / Procter Fishburne vs Emily Gottwald / Chris Price4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-01-12vs 12 Herm Yablonski 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth West / Robert Nilson vs Christopher Forstner / Lesley Alouf0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Keith / Harry Turton vs Suzanne Gardner / Patrick Fagan0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoe Defilippo / Meredith Berger vs Andrea Broughton / Turner Broughton6-1, 6-3
2025-01-05vs 9 Hermitage Blankley 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesProcter Fishburne / Christine Albrecht vs Brittany Nichols / Daniel Essad7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Allison Woodruff
published 3.5
3.38
Kate Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Procter Fishburne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Kirby Fields
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Christine Albrecht
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.32
Elizabeth Keith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Mark Wickersham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Cherie Warfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Kennon Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Harry Turton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Elizabeth West
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Brad Rodgers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Patricia Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Robert Nilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Meredith Berger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Joe Defilippo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Erin Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Caren Payne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jim Fraser
published
Lauren King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Louise O'Connor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Albrecht + Mark Wickersham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Woodruff
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kate Hamilton
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Procter Fishburne
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kirby Fields
11W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Christine Albrecht
122W–58L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Elizabeth Keith
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Mark Wickersham
13W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Cherie Warfield
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Kennon Harrison
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Harry Turton
16W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Elizabeth West
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Brad Rodgers
2W–8L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Patricia Bishop
9W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Robert Nilson
12W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Meredith Berger
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Joe Defilippo
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Erin Gardner
12W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Caren Payne
111W–67L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Jim Fraser
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren King
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Louise O'Connor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.