Teams

HG GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs WC GOLDLost 13
L#1 DoublesKevin Miller / Bradley Scott vs Ian Falivene / Aaron Muhl6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Cadkin vs Dave Schmitt6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJay Vancik / Bryan Langman vs Jeffrey Burton / Robert Parmer4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAndrew Vega / Mike Hendricks vs Craig Masur / Michael Gagne1-6, 0-6
2022-07-12vs GAC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesTed McCausland / Kevin Miller vs Mike Holmes / Andrew Weinfeld3-5
L#2 DoublesJay Vancik / Bryan Langman vs Eric Edwards / Peter Marle0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMike Hendricks / Brian Miserlian vs Todd Beagle / Rich Unger1-6, 1-6
2022-07-05vs EM GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesMark Custer / Andrew Vega vs TIMOTHY DENEZZA / Darren Malia2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Cadkin vs Luke Hanna6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJay Vancik / Mike Hendricks vs Stephen LoJacono / David Dornbirer0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Miserlian / Daniel McGowan vs Marty Volin / Jay Simonson3-6, 2-6
2022-06-28vs HV GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesTed McCausland / Mark Custer vs Michael Kershner / Claud Payne6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDaniel McGowan / Miles David vs Tim Boyer / Thomas Calgaard6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKen Peterlin / Mike Hendricks vs Alex Purchase / Tom Horne3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-21vs HFII REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBradley Scott / John Anderson vs Jessi Andrews / Matthew Linnell3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Cadkin vs Ryan Stowe7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKen Peterlin / Mike Hendricks vs John Hiner / Jon Jacobson1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel McGowan / Miles David vs Gil Adamowski / Greg Mohrman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-14vs VC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Vega / Kevin Miller vs Tom Chichester / Karr Mccurdy2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKen Peterlin / Bryan Langman vs Richard Tallian / Thomas Ward2-6, 6-7
2022-06-07vs CCV BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesBradley Scott / Ted McCausland vs Eli Goldstein / Arion Robbins1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKen Peterlin / Bryan Langman vs Tom Wilson / Adam Bogue3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel McGowan / Mike Hendricks vs Jacob Milder / David Piantanida1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
John Cadkin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.06
Miles David
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Ted McCausland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Bryan Langman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Mark Custer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Bradley Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Andrew Vega
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Daniel McGowan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Brian Miserlian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jay Vancik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ken Peterlin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mike Hendricks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ted McCausland + Mark Custer4160% games+10.9% vs expected
Bradley Scott + Ted McCausland1434% games+3.1% vs expected
Mark Custer + Bryan Langman4548% games−1.0% vs expected
Bradley Scott + Mark Custer0522% games−12.4% vs expected
Brian Miserlian + Daniel McGowan0619% games−16.8% vs expected
Ted McCausland + Bryan Langman3249% gamesnot enough data
John Cadkin + Miles David134 matchesnot enough data
Ken Peterlin + Mark Custer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Cadkin
45W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Miles David
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Ted McCausland
42W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Bryan Langman
22W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
2.5
Mark Custer
28W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%47%53%
2.51
2.5
Bradley Scott
21W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Andrew Vega
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Daniel McGowan
4W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Brian Miserlian
0W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jay Vancik
1W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ken Peterlin
0W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Hendricks
1W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.