Teams

A18 3.0W AO2 Radachi

2023 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over · NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-11vs A18 3.0W AO1 GowdaWon 41
L#1 DoublesJulie Spintzyk / Sandra Neustadtl vs Kristen Boll / Jennifer Smith4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesStefanie Radachi vs Karin Mellino6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Glass / MEGAN EDGEHOUSE vs Asha Gowda / Paula Drapcho5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSara Kurt vs Jeanine Long6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShannon Carey / Courtney Harrigan vs Pandora Shepherd / Linda Bates6-1, 6-0
2023-06-27vs A18 3.0W PW3 McDonnellWon 40
W#1 DoublesJulie Spintzyk / Sandra Neustadtl vs Brooke Kelsey / Jaclyn Slattery6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesStefanie Radachi vs Erin Meisenzahl6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSara Kurt vs Shannon McDonnell6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCourtney Harrigan / Shannon Carey vs Susan Packer / Susan Groza6-4, 7-6
2023-06-20vs A18 3.0W BV BeneventoWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Glass / Lisa Camardo vs Ann Nock / Geraldine Butler7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAlexandria Martin vs Kelsey Nicole Jeffery1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Spintzyk / Sandra Neustadtl vs Liza Smith / Gretchen Losey6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSara Kurt vs Diana Bilic6-2, 6-2
2023-05-30vs A18 3.0W AO1 GowdaWon 32
W#1 DoublesStefanie Radachi / Shannon Carey vs Melissa Steele / Linda Bates6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSara Kurt vs Kristen Boll1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Spintzyk / Sandra Neustadtl vs Sherry Carbeck / Karin Mellino2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAlexandria Martin vs Jeanine Long2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCourtney Harrigan / Jennifer Glass vs Pandora Shepherd / Mallory Parker6-3, 6-1
2023-05-23vs A18 3.0W PW3 McDonnellWon 41
W#1 DoublesMEGAN EDGEHOUSE / Jennifer Glass vs Lisa Lawrence / Michelle Reef4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlexandria Martin vs Erin Meisenzahl5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStefanie Radachi / Shannon Carey vs Dawn Russo / Gina Christoffers6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSara Kurt vs Brooke Kelsey6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCourtney Harrigan / Lisa Camardo vs Susan Packer / Susan Groza4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-16vs A18 3.0W BV BeneventoLost 23
L#1 DoublesStefanie Radachi / Courtney Harrigan vs Ann Hanrahan / Susan Benevento5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesSandra Neustadtl vs Isabella Heimke6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Glass / MEGAN EDGEHOUSE vs Caroline Zuchold / Elizabeth Sullivan6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesShannon Carey vs Julia Pruchnicki6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAlexandria Martin / Danielle Richards vs Liza Smith / Kristen Chew2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Courtney Harrigan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Sara Kurt
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
3.16
MEGAN EDGEHOUSE
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.90
Sandra Neustadtl
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Barbara Myers
published 3
2.67
Julie Spintzyk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Alexandria Martin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Danielle Richards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Camardo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Shannon Carey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Stefanie Radachi
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Spintzyk + Sandra Neustadtl101149% games−4.8% vs expected
Courtney Harrigan + Shannon Carey5352% gamesnot enough data
MEGAN EDGEHOUSE + Shannon Carey314 matchesnot enough data
Stefanie Radachi + Shannon Carey303 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Neustadtl + Courtney Harrigan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Courtney Harrigan
47W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
Sara Kurt
32W–24L career · 10 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
MEGAN EDGEHOUSE
33W–18L career · 8 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Sandra Neustadtl
37W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Barbara Myers
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Spintzyk
46W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Alexandria Martin
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Danielle Richards
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Camardo
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shannon Carey
33W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stefanie Radachi
43W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.