Teams

9.0 PHX Mercier W65

2023 SPRING Adult 65 & Over - CAZ · 9.0 PHX 65 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.07 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-12-02vs Southwest/Winchell /65&Over9.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Watts / Cynthia Zirpolo vs Genevieve Leavitt / Elizabeth Gamez0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRoslyn Beckwith / Barbara Everard vs Maggie Winchell / Stacy Renner6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChriss Hixon / Sherri Bronson vs Eleanor Lockwood / Diane Stuart6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-12-02vs Southwest/Winchell /65&Over9.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoslyn Beckwith / Mara Ferrari vs Lynn Thomas / Diane Stuart2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSherri Bronson / Chriss Hixon vs Elizabeth Gamez / Eleanor Lockwood2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Taylor / Nancy Katz vs Genevieve Leavitt / Linda Groft4-6, 3-6
2023-12-01vs Southwest/Winchell /65&Over9.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSherri Bronson / Chriss Hixon vs Lynn Thomas / Maggie Winchell2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Katz / Diane Taylor vs Linda Groft / Genevieve Leavitt4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Barnett / Barbara Everard vs Eleanor Lockwood / Elizabeth Gamez6-7, 1-6
2023-12-01vs Southwest/Winchell /65&Over9.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Taylor / Cheryl Barnett vs Stacy Renner / Maggie Winchell6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMara Ferrari / Barbara Everard vs Elizabeth Gamez / Eleanor Lockwood1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnn Watts / Lisa Mercier vs Linda Groft / Genevieve Leavitt1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 PHX 65 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southwest/Winchell /65&Over9.0W40111585
29.0 PHX Mercier W650411122135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Diane Taylor
published 4.5
4.12
Sherri Bronson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Chriss Hixon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Mara Ferrari
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Barbara Everard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Betsy Lovell
published 4
Cheryl Barnett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.65
Ann Watts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Cynthia Zirpolo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Mercier
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Nancy Katz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roslyn Beckwith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherri Bronson + Chriss Hixon033 matchesnot enough data
Mara Ferrari + Ann Watts213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane Taylor
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherri Bronson
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Chriss Hixon
67W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.00
4
Mara Ferrari
312W–180L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Barbara Everard
109W–122L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Betsy Lovell
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cheryl Barnett
11W–6L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Ann Watts
33W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Cynthia Zirpolo
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Mercier
65W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Katz
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Roslyn Beckwith
133W–48L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.