Teams

Broome/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Women - WED AM

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-19vs Ranero/Yung-Okamoto/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Gibbs / Sara Baker vs Kathleen Doulin / Heather Laney3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDebra Hutjens vs Kaly Bush6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChantel Wujtow / Kelly Bennie vs Donna Leedle / Julie Segura2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - WED AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Debra Hutjens
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Chantel Wujtow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Susanna Vaughan
published
3.43
Michelle Palk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Lynelle McDonald
published
3.40
Sara Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.39
Sara Baker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Sunyoung Fitt
published
3.33
Kelly Bennie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Ellen Eagon
published
3.22
Rebecca Sara Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Lynn Strevell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Susan Lahey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Kristi Broome
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Elizabeth Jewell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Baker + Sara Gibbs9652% games+5.2% vs expected
Susan Lahey + Rebecca Sara Cook1544% games+0.1% vs expected
Kelly Bennie + Sunyoung Fitt314 matchesnot enough data
Sunyoung Fitt + Susan Lahey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Hutjens
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.91
4
Chantel Wujtow
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Susanna Vaughan
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Michelle Palk
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Lynelle McDonald
6W–21L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Sara Gibbs
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Sara Baker
24W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Sunyoung Fitt
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kelly Bennie
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Ellen Eagon
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Rebecca Sara Cook
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Lynn Strevell
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Susan Lahey
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Kristi Broome
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Elizabeth Jewell
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.