Teams

MWaleski (Hornets Nest)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-22vs DPazo/CSwaminathan (BRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJosh Goldblatt / Timothy Shaw vs Lenny Villafana / Jose Villafana6-3, 7-6
2025-04-16vs JClarke/Dukes (Matthews)Won 10
W#1 DoublesFrank Martin / Justin Beverley vs Duane Johnson / Jared Dukes5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-03vs RMaddle (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Beverley / Joel Turner vs Chris Tomlinson / Michael Moloney6-2, 6-3
2025-03-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoel Turner / Josh Goldblatt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-21vs DNunn/NBragg (Foxcroft Hills)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlex King / Justin Beverley vs Bret Sprague / Stephen Moser7-6, 7-5
2025-03-13vs BSmith (Windyrush)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Beverley / John Deering vs Daniel Comisar / Neil Handelsman6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Christopher Gowin
published 4.5
4.37
Andre Simeon
published 4.5
4.34
Thomas Jeter
published
4.29
Justin Beverley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.29
Josh Goldblatt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Chris Markowski
published 4.5
4.24
Richard Merino
published
4.24
Thomas Bixler
published
4.24
John Deering
published
4.22
Timothy Shaw
published
4.20
Frank Martin
published
4.17
Patrick Burns
published
4.12
Ravi Mujumdar
published
4.05
Joel Turner
published
4.03
Michael Waleski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Goldblatt + Justin Beverley4253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Gowin
21W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Andre Simeon
24W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
4.37
Thomas Jeter
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Justin Beverley
86W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Josh Goldblatt
150W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Chris Markowski
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Merino
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Thomas Bixler
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
John Deering
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
Timothy Shaw
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Frank Martin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Patrick Burns
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
4.17
Ravi Mujumdar
19W–19L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Joel Turner
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Michael Waleski
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.