Teams

Escambia/Anderson/40&Over3.0M

2024 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesJaymes Tran / Jim Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-10vs O'Neill - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Schmidt / Jim Smith vs Matthew O'Neill / James Grant6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-09vs O'Neill - PCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesJaymes Tran / Jerry Clark vs Hunter Stark / Mike Esmonde6-1, 6-1
2024-03-27vs O'Neill - PCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Smith / Jaymes Tran vs Mike Esmonde / Bobby Corbett6-2, 6-2
2024-03-20vs O'Neill - PCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracy Schmidt / Jerry Clark vs James Grant / Brody Mcelhany6-1, 6-3
2024-03-13vs O'Neill - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJim Smith / Beau Bullard vs Hurst Butts / Bobby Corbett6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Peyton Blackledge
published
3.19
Jerry Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Clay Anderson
published 3.5
2.93
Ethan Rhone
published
2.89
Beau Bullard
published 3
2.88
Tracy Schmidt
published
2.84
Jonathan Llanera
published
2.79
A Haigler
published 3
2.77
Rick Bucco
published
2.72
Jim Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Jaymes Tran
published
Douglas Lurton
published
Tim James
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Smith + Jerry Clark303 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Schmidt + Beau Bullard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peyton Blackledge
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Jerry Clark
145W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Clay Anderson
32W–19L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Ethan Rhone
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Beau Bullard
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Tracy Schmidt
16W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Jonathan Llanera
22W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
3
A Haigler
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Rick Bucco
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Jim Smith
83W–69L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Jaymes Tran
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
Douglas Lurton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim James
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.