Teams

CDTA S A40W3.0 4Centennial Tromp Wed 7 $20

CDTA 1Summer Adult 40 & Over wknd · nght

15 players · average NTRP 3.11 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesBeth Goldberg / Claire Tramm vs Liza Xanthopoulos / Mary Chang6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSimone Brown / Mary Kaczmarek vs Karla Gidwani / Leslie Sauer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatherine Stone / Shelby Hasten vs Jen Funches / Jane Hensel3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChris Henderson / Katherine Stone vs Paula Casas / Prabha Parameswaran6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErin McCarthy / Claire Tramm vs Carolyn Driscoll / Shannyn Smith7-5, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJeanne Tromp / Renee Lanam vs Julie Bell / Maribeth Corbett3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Kaczmarek / Claire Tramm vs Laura Breakstone / Samantha Garrity0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesShelby Hasten / Katherine Stone vs Jude Sharp / Jenna Stanley6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBeth Goldberg / Simone Brown vs Julie Carr / Stephanie Fishel6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatherine Stone / Erin McCarthy vs Judy Dluzen / DEBORAH LEMONIDIS6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMichelle Yeh / Kelli Brinkman vs Lindsay Miller / Ally Alston6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLelia Lanuza / Simone Brown vs Molly Klein Catalano / Andrea Sosa6-3, 6-4
2025-05-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Yeh / Lelia Lanuza vs Aimee Hombach / Ann Phillips7-6, 4-1
W#1 DoublesKelli Brinkman / Michelle Yeh vs Michelle Nacheman / Linda DeNardis6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeth Goldberg / Mary Kaczmarek vs Christina Fleming / Modupe Sobo6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A40W3.0 4Centennial Tromp Wed 7 $206120818189
2CDTA S A40W3.0 2MT Chi Brown-2 Sun 6 $31.56121720175
3CDTA S A40W3.0 5River Trails Cox Sun 4 $265220820192
4CDTA S A40W3.0 9MT Bann (OUT) Shappert Sat 2 $2743181024203
5CDTA S A40W3.0 3Lake Bluff Sherman Sat 4 $2243161226192
6CDTA S A40W3.0 8Heritage Werts Thu 7 $242591939261
7CDTA S A40W3.0 1MT Chi Brown-1 Sun 2 $31.501642448290
8DROPPED CDTA S A40W3.0 7MT Pal Dluzen Sat 2 $26000000
9CDTA S A40W3.0 6Centennial Steinbrueck Sat 9 $200742449303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Claire Tramm
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.29
Jeanne Tromp
published 3.5
3.25
Kelli Brinkman
published 3.5
3.08
Lelia Lanuza
published 3
3.05
Michelle Yeh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Christie Jordan
published 3
2.92
Nora Jewett
published 3
2.89
Simone Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Beth Goldberg
published 3
Chris Henderson
published 3
Erin McCarthy
published 3
2.71
Katherine Stone
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.54
Mary Kaczmarek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Renee Lanam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shelby Hasten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lelia Lanuza + Simone Brown6080% games+18.5% vs expected
Lelia Lanuza + Christie Jordan10264% games+6.8% vs expected
Kelli Brinkman + Nora Jewett8362% games+2.4% vs expected
Michelle Yeh + Kelli Brinkman6756% games+1.7% vs expected
Renee Lanam + Jeanne Tromp3348% games−8.2% vs expected
Michelle Yeh + Jeanne Tromp5260% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kaczmarek + Simone Brown2351% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Yeh + Simone Brown314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Claire Tramm
29W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Kelli Brinkman
45W–18L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Lelia Lanuza
32W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
Michelle Yeh
68W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Christie Jordan
84W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Nora Jewett
37W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Simone Brown
44W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Beth Goldberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chris Henderson
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Erin McCarthy
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Stone
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Mary Kaczmarek
18W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Renee Lanam
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Shelby Hasten
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.