Teams

Stanovich-OSTC

2025 Mixed 55 & Over-GC · 3.5 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-29vs Biloxi AdamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Allison / David Stanovich vs Lowell Hayes / Rebecca Mayfield4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Benson / Phyllis Shoemake vs Gwen Urbati / Michael Penny4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLeslie Collins / John Panter vs Dena Karr / Reuben Byrd6-4, 7-5
2025-07-28vs Diamondhead RobertsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Panter / Leslie Collins vs Peter Dorner / Kristin Beddoe6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Benson / Phyllis Shoemake vs Michael Wellman / Kathleen Oneil6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesWilliam Troutman / Shari Pol vs Shane Finley / Stephanie Hardie1-6, 4-6
2025-07-14vs 55+Knight BBTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Stanovich / Phyllis Shoemake vs Linda Benigno / Kevin Fish6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShari Pol / John Wilkinson vs Craig Brown / Audry Bush3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Collins / John Panter vs Russell Weatherly / Tracie Normand6-1, 6-4
2025-07-10vs Biloxi-Thunelus 55 MixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Troutman / Sue Battaile vs Holly Bourgeois / David VanVeghel6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Wilkinson / Shari Pol vs Julia Weaver / Archie Reeves6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLori Dewitt / Robert Benson vs Torie Hardee / Joe Mitchell6-3, 6-3
2025-06-25vs Biloxi AdamsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Wilkinson / Torria Dale vs Reuben Byrd / Dena Karr3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Collins / John Panter vs Lowell Hayes / Rebecca Mayfield7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Stanovich / Phyllis Shoemake vs Gwen Urbati / Michael Penny7-5, 6-3
2025-06-04vs Diamondhead RobertsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslie Collins / John Panter vs Kristin Beddoe / Gilbert Robinson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Stanovich / Phyllis Shoemake vs Courtney Schiro / Shane Finley6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSue Battaile / Robert Benson vs Ronnie Savoy / Traci Frizzell6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-28vs 55+Knight BBTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Panter / Phyllis Shoemake vs Russell Weatherly / Sam Allen6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Stanovich / Torria Dale vs GARY KEEL / Audry Bush7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWilliam Troutman / Shari Pol vs Roy Deatherage / Linda Benigno6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-21vs Biloxi-Thunelus 55 MixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Wilkinson / Stephanie Allison vs Holly Bourgeois / David VanVeghel6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Panter / Leslie Collins vs Bob Thunelius / Torie Hardee6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDouglas Branam / Lori Dewitt vs Joe Mitchell / Toni Fillmore6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stanovich-OSTC6218618178
255+Knight BBTC6216824225
3Biloxi Adams5214715164
4Diamondhead Roberts2691533226
5Biloxi-Thunelus 55 Mixed0702142253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
John Panter
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.48
David Stanovich
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Phyllis Shoemake
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Douglas Branam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Robert Benson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Stephanie Allison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
William Troutman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Torria Dale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Shari Pol
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Sue Battaile
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Lori Dewitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Allison + David Stanovich5069% games+7.7% vs expected
William Troutman + Shari Pol2357% games−2.2% vs expected
William Troutman + Sue Battaile314 matchesnot enough data
Phyllis Shoemake + David Stanovich303 matchesnot enough data
Lori Dewitt + David Stanovich303 matchesnot enough data
Lori Dewitt + Robert Benson213 matchesnot enough data
David Stanovich + Sue Battaile123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Panter
32W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
David Stanovich
35W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Phyllis Shoemake
19W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Douglas Branam
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Robert Benson
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Stephanie Allison
27W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
William Troutman
22W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Torria Dale
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Shari Pol
27W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sue Battaile
46W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Lori Dewitt
35W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.