Teams

BCST BLUE

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-03vs NJ GREYLost 02
L#1 SinglesRoger Williams vs James Smith6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKeiler Kroog / Steve Monroe vs Ernest Reece / Kevin Furlong5-7, 0-6
2025-08-19vs MC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteve Monroe / Josh McMahon vs Dustin Snell / John Policaro6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRoger Williams / Mark Brown vs Daniel Port / Eric Wilfong1-6, 4-6
2025-08-18vs LTC-D BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesKeiler Kroog / Mark Brown vs Kurt Zimmerman / Zachary Knaus2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJoe Kroog vs Richard Craven0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Monroe / Scott Johnston vs David Atkinson / Jean Francois3-6, 1-6
2025-08-11vs KC-CC ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoe Kroog / Scott Johnston vs Dan Strietelmeier / Curtis Crites7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSteve Monroe / Keiler Kroog vs Richard Frisz / Mike Kozlowski4-6, 4-6
2025-08-04vs RHCC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoger Williams / Joe Kroog vs Daniel Konecny / Aaron Brewster6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKeiler Kroog vs Aaron Medlock0-6, 0-6
2025-07-28vs MC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Monroe / Roger Williams vs David Fathalikhani / Daniel Port1-6, 1-6
2025-07-21vs NJ GREYWon 21
L#1 DoublesSteve Monroe / Mark Brown vs Jeremy Riggle / Ernest Reece2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRoger Williams vs Jeremy Wilder7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoe Kroog / Keiler Kroog vs James Smith / Erik E Lindholm6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Roger Williams
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.89
Joe Kroog
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Steve Monroe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Keiler Kroog
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Monroe + Joe Kroog4159% games+8.8% vs expected
Roger Williams + Joe Kroog13260% games+7.2% vs expected
Steve Monroe + Roger Williams3346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Roger Williams
121W–125L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Joe Kroog
70W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Steve Monroe
16W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Keiler Kroog
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.