Teams

KY/LOU/SCARBROUGH

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-31vs KY/LOU/JONESLost 05
L#1 DoublesLissa McCracken / Suling Zhang vs Alissa Sample / Janna Flowers1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRobin Scarbrough vs Carrie Merrill0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Mosby / Kelly Nixon vs Nicole Jones-Latka / Mallory Strange0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBrooke Lampton vs Allison Morris0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTerri Blose / Lisa Ogburn vs Lisa Jones / Lashae Higdon4-6, 3-6
2025-05-25vs KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD(NPC)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesSuling Zhang / Jennifer Schulz vs Lynn Supple / Shelby Fill3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrooke Lampton vs Stephanie Metten0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Scarbrough / Rhonda Shaver vs Hannah Sencindiver / Nikki Prescott1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNamuun Gantumur vs Ashley Johnson7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Eckert / Linda Rice vs Katie Uttich / Taylor Bockweg1-6, 1-6
2025-05-11vs KY/LOU/SHAIN/SCHNURRLost 14
L#1 DoublesTerri Blose / Suling Zhang vs Deanna Gordinier / Katie Nichols3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNamuun Gantumur vs Caroline Mulcahy6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Ferguson / Kelly Nixon vs Katie Windhorst / Betsy Brill0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTsolmonica Batbold vs Kelsie Williams0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Mosby / Linda Rice vs Kacy Noltemeyer / Martha Hudson2-6, 2-6
2025-03-23vs KY/LOU/MCGLONE/KEEHANSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSuling Zhang / Jennifer Schulz vs Celina Keehan / Kara Towarnicki1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNamuun Gantumur / Julie Eckert vs Kelsey Watts / Alex Hargadon Knauss7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRobin Scarbrough vs Katie Hockensmith6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Mosby / Jennifer Park vs Meredith Taylor / Brooke Ault1-6, 1-6
2025-03-14vs KY/LOU/BROWN/SPILLMANLost 05
L#1 DoublesTerri Blose / Kelly Nixon vs Laura Mahoney / Jennifer Giacobbe0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRhonda Shaver vs Carolyn Holland1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Taylor / Suling Zhang vs Janet Parrish / Spencer Outlaw1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRobin Scarbrough vs Marilyn Croak4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Mosby / Lisa Ogburn vs Amy Perpich / Sarah Clevenger2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Namuun Gantumur
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
2.64
Suling Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.63
Julie Eckert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Tsolmonica Batbold
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.55
Robin Scarbrough
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.48
Terri Blose
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Linda Rice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Jennifer Schulz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Kelly Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.06
Brooke Lampton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.04
Diana Mosby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.00
Shannon Wickel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Ogburn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lissa McCracken
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rhonda Shaver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Nixon + Brooke Lampton2340% games+2.1% vs expected
Robin Scarbrough + Suling Zhang3349% games+1.3% vs expected
Linda Rice + Diana Mosby01021% games−17.2% vs expected
Linda Rice + Lisa Ogburn033 matchesnot enough data
Linda Rice + Shannon Wickel123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Ogburn + Diana Mosby033 matchesnot enough data
Diana Mosby + Lissa McCracken033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Schulz + Suling Zhang033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Namuun Gantumur
22W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Suling Zhang
4W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Julie Eckert
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
Tsolmonica Batbold
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Robin Scarbrough
22W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.55
Terri Blose
0W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Linda Rice
5W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Jennifer Schulz
0W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40
Kelly Nixon
11W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Brooke Lampton
10W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Diana Mosby
4W–39L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Shannon Wickel
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Lisa Ogburn
0W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lissa McCracken
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Shaver
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.