Teams

C 6.5M TP Licari

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 6.5 Combo Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · NEOTA 6.5 Combo Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 6.5M TP Licari000000
2C 6.5M PM Sheik000000
3C 6.5M PW Lonsway000000
4C 6.5M MM O'Donnell000000
5C 6.5M MM Samantaray000000
6C 6.5M MM Ghosh000000
7C 6.5M MM Borawake000000
8C 6.5M LT Fiedler000000
9C 6.5M GR Stone000000
10C 6.5M BR Swallen000000
11C 6.5M MV Miluk000000
12C 6.5M000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Mike Devine
published
3.35
Patrick Renz
published
3.28
Steve Barker
published
3.21
James Schulte
published 3.5
3.10
John Consilio
published
3.04
Ben Vasunia
published 3.5
3.04
Ronald Bassak
published
2.92
Brian Shaffer
published 3
2.80
Frank Licari
published 3
2.79
Timothy Patterson
published
2.79
Brian Lambright
published 3
2.73
Diego Hernandez
published 3
2.71
Dave Espersen
published 3
2.61
Renier Soto
published
2.59
Sean O'donnell
published
2.19
Jeff Scafaro
published
Mark Caldwell
published
Tony Wiglusz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Schulte + Brian Lambright2345% games+3.4% vs expected
James Schulte + John Consilio241651% games+1.8% vs expected
Mark Caldwell + James Schulte121253% games+0.7% vs expected
Frank Licari + John Consilio4256% games−2.2% vs expected
James Schulte + Patrick Renz4451% games−2.8% vs expected
Ronald Bassak + John Consilio1641% gamesnot enough data
Ronald Bassak + James Schulte4250% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Renz + Steve Barker3354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Devine
45W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Patrick Renz
71W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Steve Barker
77W–60L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
James Schulte
110W–75L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
John Consilio
116W–87L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Ben Vasunia
3W–26L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.04
Ronald Bassak
52W–95L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Brian Shaffer
33W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Frank Licari
86W–84L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Timothy Patterson
25W–62L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Brian Lambright
84W–158L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Diego Hernandez
21W–45L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Dave Espersen
12W–23L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
Renier Soto
13W–23L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.61
Sean O'donnell
7W–23L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Jeff Scafaro
10W–37L career · no lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.19
Mark Caldwell
51W–45L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tony Wiglusz
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.