Teams

PCRK ORANGE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-05vs HRCA-N BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJason Bisanti / Josh Dougan vs Mark Stangeland / Mustafa Neemuchwala6-4, 3-1
2023-08-29vs LTFC GREYLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Whipple / Chris Whipple vs Adam Nielson / Scott Sajowitz2-6, 5-7
2023-08-22vs SS-H ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJosh Dougan / Daniel Conroy vs Ryan Beckstrom / Bryan Sutter7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Whipple / Chris Whipple vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-08vs SS-LT ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJosh Dougan / Chip Hudson vs Nick Taylor / Andrew Holmes6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaul Whipple / Chris Whipple vs Edward Thompson / Andrew Folkerth6-4, 7-5
2023-08-01vs HRCA-N BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesChip Hudson / Josh Dougan vs Mustafa Neemuchwala / Miguel Phelps6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaul Whipple / Scott Justus vs Mark Stangeland / Todd Harrington6-4, 7-6
2023-07-25vs LTFC GREYWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Whipple / Chris Whipple vs Adam Nielson / Scott Sajowitz7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJosh Dougan / Scott Justus vs Eric Wohl / Christopher Dillon6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Paul Whipple
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.41
Daniel Conroy
published 4.5
4.41
Josh Dougan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.38
Jason Bisanti
published 4.5
4.20
Chip Hudson
published 4.5
4.08
Scott Justus
published
4.06
Chris Whipple
published 4.5
3.70
Eddie Pells
published
Rene del Barco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Conroy + Josh Dougan8067% games+8.4% vs expected
Paul Whipple + Chris Whipple5159% games+3.2% vs expected
Paul Whipple + Josh Dougan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Paul Whipple
162W–50L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
4.48
4.5
Daniel Conroy
22W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
4.41
4.5
Josh Dougan
95W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Jason Bisanti
35W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
4.38
4.5
Chip Hudson
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.20
Scott Justus
17W–21L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Chris Whipple
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
4.06
Eddie Pells
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Rene del Barco
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.