Teams

7 ACAC Johnston

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-04vs 3 Woodlake PattersonWon 30
W#1 SinglesStuart Fulcher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Scott Kim vs Tommy Bader / Edward Moss6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNathan Arland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-30vs 5 Ridgetop LefkowitzWon 20
W#2 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Albert Thomas vs Charles Wayland / David Rathke6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesScott Kim / Nathan Arland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesNathan Arland / Jimmy Ghaphery vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-10vs 8 Morgan's Stand at James RiverLost 02
L#1 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Albert Thomas vs Allen Huang / Evan Martin1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathan Arland / Eric Nelson vs Naveen Chennupati / Dale Nowery2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-07vs 2 MRTC Battery Park SpivackLost 01
L#1 SinglesJimmy Ghaphery vs Wayne Motley1-6, 3-6
2023-04-23vs 6 Willow Oaks PerronWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Cable / Nathan Arland vs David Roberts / Holland Rhoads6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJimmy Ghaphery vs David Nedeff6-2, 6-2
2023-04-16vs 4 Westwood GodseyLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlbert Thomas / Stuart Fulcher vs Richard Godsey / David Sun - (DQ)3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJimmy Ghaphery vs Colin Mudrick1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Johnston / Nathan Arland vs Graham Bor / Ben Hall0-6, 2-6
2023-04-02vs 3 Woodlake PattersonWon 10
W#2 SinglesJimmy Ghaphery vs Wieslaw Gumulak4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Stuart Fulcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.01
Scott Kim
published
3.98
Nathan Arland
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Jimmy Ghaphery
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4.5
3.95
Michael Cable
published
3.86
James Holland
published
3.77
Keith Adams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Holland + Keith Adams5156% games+6.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stuart Fulcher
149W–170L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
Scott Kim
4W–19L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Nathan Arland
82W–79L career · 6 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
4.5
Jimmy Ghaphery
61W–90L career · 6 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.95
Michael Cable
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.95
James Holland
28W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86
Keith Adams
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.