Teams

Volley and Vino

2024 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-02vs Pink FlamingosLost 01
L#3 DoublesNancy Gordon / Kristen Pentz-Weitz vs Carolyn Snyder / Karen Silva3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-27vs Racquet RebelsWon 20
W#2 DoublesKristen Pentz-Weitz / Jody Orr vs Elizabeth Schneider / Martine Castoro6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKim Roth / Nancy Gordon vs Nancy Napier / Natalie Carlise6-0, 6-3
2024-06-20vs ACES & LACESWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusie Christie / Priscilla Routson vs Sue Large / Elisa Schutz6-2, 6-3
2024-06-18vs Fine WhinesLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathy Deahl / Kristen Pentz-Weitz vs Marilyn Ludt / Karen Mulhern1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-06-13vs Lucky AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaryn Goodale-Durham / Kristen Pentz-Weitz vs Jodi Whittaker / Christa Napier3-6, 3-4
2024-06-11vs Acing GracefullySplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusie Christie / Patricia Hoffman vs Leah Butler / Jan Skelley6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Gordon / Melissa Waine-Cunliffe vs Michele Bowden / Jennifer Boyd3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-06vs Pink FlamingosWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Gordon / Jody Orr vs Connie Areitio / Nancy Fuhrman6-1, 6-3
2024-06-04vs Racquet RebelsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKim Roth / Susie Christie vs Natalie Carlise / Stacey Novak6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Waine-Cunliffe / Kristen Pentz-Weitz vs Michelle Brack / Martine Castoro7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ACES & LACES7119513147
2Lucky Aces7118613146
3Volley and Vino53131122183
4Racquet Rebels2681635245
5Pink Flamingos1761838245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Carrie Fischer
published 3.5
2.87
Kim Roth
published 3
2.71
Kathy Deahl
published 3
Jennifer Clements
published
Jody Orr
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Karyn Goodale-Durham
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Kristen Pentz-Weitz
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Melissa Waine-Cunliffe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Priscilla Routson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Susan Keller
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Susie Christie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Hoffman + Kim Roth81053% gamesnot enough data
Jody Orr + Patricia Hoffman8554% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Gordon + Kathy Deahl2840% gamesnot enough data
Susan Keller + Carrie Fischer2837% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Gordon + Carrie Fischer6247% gamesnot enough data
Karyn Goodale-Durham + Kim Roth4453% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Deahl + Jody Orr2445% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Deahl + Kristen Pentz-Weitz4255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Fischer
77W–53L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Kim Roth
41W–51L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Kathy Deahl
29W–61L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
Jennifer Clements
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jody Orr
12W–27L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karyn Goodale-Durham
41W–55L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristen Pentz-Weitz
24W–63L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Waine-Cunliffe
25W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Gordon
37W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Hoffman
114W–123L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Priscilla Routson
51W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Keller
54W–55L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susie Christie
40W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.