Teams

Bonsignore - RS Clay

2022 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-03vs Penn - RS ClayWon 21
W#1 SinglesRene Abel vs Thuy Nguyen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Lauren Anderson vs Kelly Dempsey / Jacqueline Wallace5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBonnie Bucco / Liz Payne vs Mecy Wimberly / Ingrid Corbett3-6, 4-6
2022-04-29vs Bryan - RS ClayWon 30
W#1 SinglesRene Abel vs Courtney Fell6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBonnie Bucco / Liz Payne vs Denise Wilson / Doris Davis6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Sue Nast vs Elizabeth Newton / Jeannette Fabbro6-2, 7-5
2022-04-19vs Escambia - SHL/TanLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Lauren Anderson vs Cherie Krohn / Anne Elidemir2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRene Abel / Liz Payne vs Dodi Stringfellow / Maureen Proctor5-7, 1-6
2022-04-12vs Penn - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Suzanne Manziek vs Jacqueline Wallace / Bonita Witkin4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRene Abel / Cindy Jenista vs Tonya DelGallo / Jennifer Gilroy3-6, 6-7
2022-03-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLiz Payne / Sally Bergosh vs Anne Elidemir / Leah Taylor0-6, 0-6
2022-03-27vs Penn - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesSally Bergosh / Liz Payne vs Kelly Dempsey / Mecy Wimberly2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRene Abel / Lauren Anderson vs Alycia Esmonde / Amanda Brown6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-23vs Escambia - SHL/TanLost 01
L#2 DoublesSue Nast / Rene Abel vs Cherie Tan / Cherie Krohn1-6, 4-6
2022-03-15vs Bryan - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesLiz Payne / Stephanie Burke vs Ann Scott / Glenda Jones6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Rene Abel
usually #1 Singles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Bonnie Bucco
published 3.5
3.30
Sue Nast
published
3.12
Susan Bonsignore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Sally Bergosh
published
2.92
Liz Payne
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Tonya Chase
published
Cindy Jenista
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rene Abel
122W–57L career · type A · 12 lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Bonnie Bucco
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
Sue Nast
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Susan Bonsignore
98W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Sally Bergosh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Liz Payne
139W–105L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Tonya Chase
10W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cindy Jenista
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.