Teams

CP:Mixed Signals:das Neves/Pon

2021 SCT Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 1

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-25vs KH:King's Highway 8.0:SnellLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Das Neves / Peter Sosnow vs Peter Snell / Hildi Todrin0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGreg Martin / Kathy Tofano vs Melissa Edwards / Yoonho Park2-6, 4-6
2021-06-19vs MIT:Milford Bulldogs:DellacroceLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrigitte Tanner / Peter Sosnow vs Chris Harder / Claudia Lacasia1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBrian Gillott / Alison Gillott vs Daniel Underkofler / Francesca Loricco1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRussvelt Vyas / Laura Buckley vs Donald Hoover / Zoe Dolan5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2021-06-06vs SOL:Way Of The Fist:SpennerLost 03
L#1 DoublesLawrence Green / Sylvia Swanson vs Emily Levine / Carlos Vasquez Sr6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGregory Toon / Christine Pon vs Dorothy Spenner / Brian Hawe4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRussvelt Vyas / Laura Buckley vs Senta Cassell / Eddie Demirci4-6, 2-6
2021-05-23vs 4S:Wise Aces:Gehrlein/WatsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesSylvia Swanson / Lawrence Green vs Cally Adl / Stephen Wimmers6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrigitte Tanner / Peter Sosnow vs Marti Correa / Igor Zoubarev6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaura Buckley / Jack Petrie vs Marta Piksinska / Ken MacLin7-6, 7-5
2021-05-02vs SOL:Winners All:DoraisLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Bennett / Scott Johnston vs Helen Chun / Robert Chun3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Pon / Gregory Toon vs Heike Martens / Jeffrey Tamis6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlison Gillott / Brian Gillott vs Jorge Linero / Jennifer Monachino-Lapey4-6, 2-6
2021-04-25vs INT:Keep it Deep:Ryan/BrozekLost 12
L#1 DoublesLouise Soifer / Peter Sosnow vs Monica Ryan / Jeffrey Brozek6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSylvia Swanson / Lawrence Green vs Oona Robinson / Atiba Rodriguez3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesWendy Bennett / Darren Senzon vs Lillian Cutaj / Michael Jo6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 8.0 Mixed 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SOL:Way Of The Fist:Spenner0615311129
2MIT:Milford Bulldogs:Dellacroce0613513143
3INT:Keep it Deep:Ryan/Brozek0612616142
4KH:King's Highway 8.0:Snell0671122167
5SOL:Winners All:Dorais0681023171
6CP:Mixed Signals:das Neves/Pon0651326175
74S:Wise Aces:Gehrlein/Watson0631531197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Lawrence Green
published
3.79
Russvelt Vyas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.76
Darren Senzon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Peter Sosnow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Kathy Tofano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Brian Gillott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.38
Brigitte Tanner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Laura Buckley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Maria Das Neves
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Sylvia Swanson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Christine Pon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jack Petrie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Louise Soifer
published
Susan Luchars
published
Wendy Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sylvia Swanson + Lawrence Green1836% games−12.3% vs expected
Maria Das Neves + Peter Sosnow224 matchesnot enough data
Brigitte Tanner + Peter Sosnow123 matchesnot enough data
Maria Das Neves + Russvelt Vyas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lawrence Green
52W–61L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
4.02
Russvelt Vyas
110W–135L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Darren Senzon
39W–53L career · 1 line in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
Peter Sosnow
138W–119L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Kathy Tofano
26W–34L career · 1 line in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Brian Gillott
26W–40L career · 2 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Brigitte Tanner
124W–163L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
Laura Buckley
128W–88L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Maria Das Neves
159W–120L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Sylvia Swanson
157W–145L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christine Pon
115W–81L career · 2 lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
2.96
Jack Petrie
54W–57L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Louise Soifer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Luchars
14W–23L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Bennett
24W–36L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.