Teams

SD 3.0WE Coronado HS/ Nelson

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE Women · SD- Women- WE 3.0

3 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-19vs SD 3.0WE SDTRC/ KleinerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Claudia Nelson vs Lisa Bolelli / Melinda Meader6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCatherine Rodman / Amy Holzer vs Cheryl Kessler / Sandy Gill1-6, 2-6
2022-06-12vs SD WE LLW 3.0 Peninsula TC/ GamaraSplit 11
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Dahlgren vs Elayne Berman6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Holzer / Catherine Rodman vs Lisa Carey / Laura Stacy3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesClaudia Nelson / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Kathryn Glaser / Rocio Gonzalez-Beristain6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCatherine Rodman / Amy Holzer vs Teri Barnes / Leanna Thompson0-6, 0-6
2022-05-31vs SD 3.0WE Balboa Smashers/ EdwardsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJessica Cunningham / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Sonia Zepeda / Robin Kardon5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Holzer vs Michelle VANN1-6, 0-6
2022-05-15vs SD 3.0WE-1PM RPTC/ SchroederLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Jessica Cunningham vs Tatiana Bourd / Dawn Sacco5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCatherine Rodman / Amy Holzer vs Sally Myungok Yeem / Melissa Biewenga3-6, 2-6
2022-05-07vs SD WE LLW 3.0 Peninsula TC/ GamaraLost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudia Nelson / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Carol Gamara / Elayne Berman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Holzer / Catherine Rodman vs Rosemary Mohler / Jo Ann Stewart1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Joan Williams vs Lene Schooley / MINGQING YANG4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Rodman / Amy Holzer vs Teri Barnes / Leanna Thompson4-6, 1-6
2022-04-24vs SD 3.0WE Balboa Smashers/ EdwardsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Williams / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Michelle VANN / Toosdhi McGowan1-6, 1-6
2022-04-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dahlgren vs Sarah Schultzel2-6, 0-6
2022-04-03vs SD 3.0WE-1PM RPTC/ SchroederLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Tabitha Anderson vs Miriam Lauff / Sally Myungok Yeem0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Rodman / Amy Holzer vs Tatiana Bourd / Chenyang Rickard0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Elizabeth Dahlgren
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.80
Amy Holzer
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3
2.76
Claudia Nelson
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Dahlgren
85W–80L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3
Amy Holzer
80W–104L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Claudia Nelson
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.