Teams

Fermstad: 3.5 DjokoGOATs 18+ ES23

2023 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 MEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-12vs Fling: 3.5 Matchpoint 18+ ES23Won 10
W#2 SinglesRashad Khan vs Jim Sandor6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-11-28vs Craig/Kruse: Net Hounds 18+ ES23Split 11
W#2 SinglesRashad Khan vs Michael Green6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Michael Tennis vs Joshua Sillers / Thomas Godfrey2-6, 3-6
2022-11-14vs Rieck: WCC 18+ ES23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAaron Bae / Rashad Khan vs Ben Puhl / ALTAF SHAIK6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-24Split 11
L#1 DoublesDerek Fermstad / Alejandro Trevino vs Chris Depies / Asim Musliar Akath3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRashad Khan vs Ilir Taushani6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-10-17vs Craig/Kruse: Net Hounds 18+ ES23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Kline / Alejandro Trevino vs Liam Gillespie / Matt Woelfel1-6, 3-6
2022-10-10Won 10
W#2 SinglesRashad Khan vs Philip Goski6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Luis Laguna
published
3.61
Rashad Khan
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.57
Ronnie Payne
published
3.47
Eric Kidd
published 4
3.39
Derek Fermstad
published 3.5
3.31
Jason Ross
published
3.30
Steve Weckman
published
3.27
Benji Mathews
published 3.5
3.24
Michael Tennis
published
3.18
Alejandro Trevino
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luis Laguna + Ronnie Payne134 matchesnot enough data
Luis Laguna + Derek Fermstad314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Laguna
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Rashad Khan
98W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.61
Ronnie Payne
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Eric Kidd
20W–27L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Derek Fermstad
37W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Jason Ross
16W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Steve Weckman
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Benji Mathews
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Michael Tennis
27W–26L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Alejandro Trevino
221W–280L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.