Teams

8 MAC Truck Loza

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-11vs 1 Richmond 4.0 TennisbumsLost 01
L#2 SinglesDylan Brod vs Everett Hettema4-6, 1-6
2023-06-02vs 3 Lakeside Park Advantage HowellLost 01
L#1 SinglesDylan Brod vs LUDINEI PICELLI1-6, 2-6
2023-05-22vs 10 TDC ShermanWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Montgomery / Dylan Brod vs Kevin McGee / Timothy Sherman6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAndrew Zima / Dylan Brod vs Lee Brooks / Edward Yesbeck7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-07vs 2 Westwood Rabhan LadybugsWon 10
W#2 SinglesDylan Brod vs Jeremiah Brown6-4, 6-3
2023-04-16vs 7 MTC Stephens ResurgenceLost 01
L#2 SinglesDylan Brod vs Geordie Stewart3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Dylan Brod
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Rob Kirkconnell
published
3.77
Andrew Zima
published 4
3.73
Michael Cabral
published
3.72
Matthew Morris
published
3.70
Colin Atkinson
published 4
3.64
Juan Loza
published
3.62
Alex Abbott
published 4
3.59
Matt Sebetic
published 4
3.56
Jeff Kane
published
3.43
Keith Garrison
published
3.31
Darrell Eakes
published 3.5
Kevin Cousins
published
Tom Rider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Sebetic + Dylan Brod2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dylan Brod
163W–98L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
Rob Kirkconnell
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Andrew Zima
23W–20L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Michael Cabral
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.73
Matthew Morris
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.72
4
Colin Atkinson
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Juan Loza
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Alex Abbott
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.62
4
Matt Sebetic
158W–90L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Jeff Kane
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Keith Garrison
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.43
3.5
Darrell Eakes
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
Kevin Cousins
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tom Rider
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.