Teams

UPTA39F/Moran/Brookstone

2024 Fall 39 & Over-Men-UPTA · 3.0 Men FF

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-09-29vs UPTA39F/Pickens/KrocWon 31
W#1 DoublesKevin Moran / Michael Woodall vs Steven Pickens / Kent Smith7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKarthik Ramaratnam vs Eric Morris6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChris Troup / Steven Weinbaum vs Michael Hoffman / Drew Nelson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Troso / Chris Fennell vs Nicholas Milcinovic / Dennis Ryan6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Rickey Bridges
published
3.11
Steven Weinbaum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Ben Wiles
published 3
2.96
Chris Troup
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Kevin Moran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Zane Powell
published
2.79
John Stegall
published
2.77
Chris Fennell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Michael Troso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Allen Douglas
published 3
2.75
Greg Brock
published 3
2.71
Earl Claypool
published 3
2.65
Karthik Ramaratnam
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Brock + Michael Troso4250% games−1.8% vs expected
Kevin Moran + Zane Powell10258% games−2.6% vs expected
Kevin Moran + Michael Troso3242% games−9.9% vs expected
Chris Troup + Kevin Moran044 matchesnot enough data
Greg Brock + Zane Powell123 matchesnot enough data
Chris Troup + Steven Weinbaum303 matchesnot enough data
Rickey Bridges + Zane Powell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rickey Bridges
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
Steven Weinbaum
23W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.11
3
Ben Wiles
27W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Chris Troup
31W–18L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.96
Kevin Moran
29W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.95
Zane Powell
26W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
John Stegall
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Chris Fennell
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Michael Troso
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Allen Douglas
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Greg Brock
13W–24L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Earl Claypool
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
Karthik Ramaratnam
4W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
13%86%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.