Teams

Maccagli/Knoxville

2026 Combo 40 & Over- Knoxville · 6.5 Women Combo Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-27vs Yoder/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesHelen Ericson / Ginger Arthur vs Shelly Krummen / Shawn Mason4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Collins / Tugba Turnaoglu vs Jill Hoschette / Karen Koester1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTara Osborne-Martz / Yoko Umezawa vs Laila Yoder / Rachel Waddell3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Helen Ericson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Deborah Szwarc
published 3.5
3.21
Yoko Umezawa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Shelly Ren
published
3.12
Michelle Uhlenhake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Jenne MacCagli
published
2.90
Ginger Arthur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Tara Osborne-Martz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Linda Bui
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
April Munoz
published 3
2.59
Jen Rose
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Tugba Turnaoglu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenne MacCagli + Michelle Uhlenhake4839% games+1.7% vs expected
Ginger Arthur + Michelle Uhlenhake3448% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Szwarc + Shelly Ren4159% gamesnot enough data
Tara Osborne-Martz + Ginger Arthur224 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Arthur + Linda Bui314 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Arthur + Jen Rose314 matchesnot enough data
Jenne MacCagli + Linda Bui134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Helen Ericson
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Deborah Szwarc
20W–17L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Yoko Umezawa
9W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Shelly Ren
8W–15L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Michelle Uhlenhake
17W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jenne MacCagli
7W–19L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Ginger Arthur
26W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.90
Tara Osborne-Martz
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
Linda Bui
23W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
April Munoz
7W–15L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Jen Rose
23W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
25%74%<1%
2.59
Tugba Turnaoglu
4W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.