Teams

Supreme Court

2024 Marion Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-03vs Marion/Giddings/40&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#2 DoublesCharles Lakatos / Ellen Perrone vs Chaya Jollu / Chrissy Hollnagel4-6, 0-6
2024-02-16vs Marion/Giddings/40&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Lakatos / Sueanne Mazzurco vs Rhonda Sangster / Christopher Clements1-6, 2-6
2024-02-06vs Marion/Giddings/40&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Perrone / Charles Lakatos vs Christopher Clements / Rhonda Sangster4-6, 5-7
2024-01-14vs Marion/Giddings/40&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Perrone / Charles Lakatos vs Joe Marino / Rhonda Sangster4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Charles Lakatos
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Rebecca Long
published
3.17
Marc Broder
published
3.12
Ellen Perrone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Margarita Posada
published
3.08
Maggie Berardi
published
3.02
Jeff Zysek
published
2.97
Joel Yap
published
2.88
Michelle Broder
published
2.81
Oksana Velis
published
Dean Ziegler
published 3
George Velez
published
Marius Taricic
published
Natalie Petsche
published
Sueanne Mazzurco
published
Wanda Simpson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Lakatos + Ellen Perrone3545% games−11.8% vs expected
Marc Broder + Michelle Broder314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charles Lakatos
68W–127L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Rebecca Long
24W–28L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Marc Broder
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Ellen Perrone
88W–117L career · 6 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Margarita Posada
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Maggie Berardi
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
Jeff Zysek
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
Joel Yap
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
Michelle Broder
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Oksana Velis
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Dean Ziegler
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
George Velez
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marius Taricic
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Natalie Petsche
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sueanne Mazzurco
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wanda Simpson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.