Teams

ParkerCFCC

2025 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 3.0 Women 18 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-02-24vs Taylor/MoyseyLost 12
W#1 SinglesJulia Schuett vs Penelope Taylor6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesClaire Foster Parker vs Alice Weiser4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMicaela Camp vs Liz Moysey2-6, 5-7
2025-02-15vs CFCC- WitmerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMabel Kitchin vs Heather Nichols6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesBrittany Rhodenhiser vs Linda Smits2-6, 2-6
2025-02-10vs Pierson 18+Split 11
L#1 SinglesMabel Kitchin vs Alisa Cowan4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesLily Murray vs Brynn McCabe6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-06vs Feeney 18 SinglesWon 20
W#2 SinglesJulia Schuett vs Jennifer Pennington6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesClaire Foster Parker vs Christine Feeney6-2, 7-5
2025-02-01vs High CFCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJulia Schuett vs Susanna Kerr5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesClaire Foster Parker vs Dena Snyder6-1, 6-4
2025-01-29vs RommelmeyerSplit 11
W#2 SinglesClaire Foster Parker vs Tracy Stephanski4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBrittany Rhodenhiser vs Molly Hanly0-6, 1-6
2025-01-29vs Kimbrough/MussellLost 02
L#2 SinglesMicaela Camp vs Alison Wilson2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesLily Murray vs Danielle King3-6, 2-6
2025-01-19vs MonahanWon 20
W#1 SinglesJulia Schuett vs Meredith Roberts6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMicaela Camp vs Danielle Scalfani7-5, 6-3
2025-01-11vs Smith 18+ SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesMabel Kitchin vs Patricia Furbay6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesClaire Foster Parker vs Lakitha Smith6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLily Murray vs Carol Drennan4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Mabel Kitchin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Julia Schuett
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Claire Foster Parker
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.72
Lily Murray
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.50
Micaela Camp
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.14
Brittany Rhodenhiser
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mabel Kitchin
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Julia Schuett
11W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Claire Foster Parker
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lily Murray
19W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Micaela Camp
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Brittany Rhodenhiser
7W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.